Property Cases

Members have breached trust unlawfully

As an ex-President and donor, I am facing a situation where 10 members have passed away, some members have resigned, and there have been no audits for 15 years, leading to a breach of trust. Three members have no objections to returning the land donated. However, the secretary and one member are attempting to transfer the trust land to another trust for their own benefits. How can I take action in this situation to protect my interests as a donor?

Sister-in-law occupied my mother’s house

My Sister-in-law occupied my mother’s house. Ram, the eldest son. He is hard working ethic and his commitment to caring for his mother. Their family had strong bonds and unity. But little did they suspect that a tempest loomed on the horizon, ready to disrupt their tranquil existence.

Meera, Ram’s sister-in-law, possessed a forceful personality and an insatiable desire for control. Moreover, over time, Meera grew dissatisfied with her own circumstances. Consequently, she found herself envious of the happiness and stability enjoyed by Ram’s family. Therefore, unable to cope with her discontentment, she resolved to sow discord within Ram’s household.

Meera initiated her campaign by incessantly complaining about every aspect of Ram’s mother’s house. Primarily, she nitpicked every minute detail, from the arrangement of furniture to the cleanliness of the space. Consequently, Ram, being a dutiful son, did his utmost to address her concerns and maintain harmony within the family.

However, matters took a turn for the worse when Meera went so far as to file an injunction against Ram. This injunction prohibited him from making any alterations or decisions regarding his mother’s house without Meera’s consent. Shocked by this act, Ram and Devi had always treated Meera as one of their own.

Amidst the ensuing chaos, Devi disclosed a secret to Ram—she had prepared a will bequeathing her entire property to him. With the intention of securing her son’s future and the well-being of her cherished grandchildren, she took this step. Emotions overwhelmed Ram upon learning this, but he was well aware that the path ahead would not be easy.

As expected, Meera and her family discovered the existence of the will and promptly contested it. They alleged that Devi was of unsound mind when the will was made and accused Ram of manipulating her to favor him. To further complicate matters, they filed a case in civil court, challenging the validity of the will.

The court battle weighed heavily on Ram and Devi, as they had always believed in the strength of their familial bonds and never anticipated such animosity within their own kin. The courtroom proceedings seemed interminable, with both sides passionately presenting their arguments.

During this arduous time, Ram sought guidance from well-wishers and legal experts. He was resolute in his determination to fight for justice and uphold his mother’s wishes. With the support of his lawyer and fueled by his love for his family, Ram presented compelling evidence and testimonies that attested to the authenticity of his mother’s will.

Finally, after months of struggle, the court reached a decision. The judge recognized the validity of Devi’s will, acknowledging her sound state of mind and the absence of any undue influence. Ram’s unwavering pursuit of justice had paid off, and the property rightfully belonged to him.

Although the legal battle had taken its toll on Ram’s family, they emerged stronger than ever before. Furthermore, they came to understand the significance of unity during trying times and, above all, the importance of love and trust within a family. As a result, Ram and Devi’s bond deepened, and they found solace in the knowledge that their unity had conquered adversity.

Although the legal battle had taken its toll on Ram’s family, they emerged stronger than ever before. Furthermore, they came to understand the significance of unity during trying times and, above all, the importance of love and trust within a family. As a result, Ram and Devi’s bond deepened, and they found solace in the knowledge that their unity had conquered adversity.

In the end, the storm that had threatened to tear the family asunder ultimately brought them closer together. Consequently, they gleaned invaluable lessons about love, resilience, and, above all, the significance of standing up for what is right. Thus my Sister-in-law has occupied my mother’s house.

After receiving substantial amount in advance the owner sold land to another person

I am interested in purchasing a piece of land. That land is situated in XXX of Sultanpur district. The owner executed a registered agreement to sell and received 90% of the sale money in advance. Owner has sold that land to another person after receiving a substantial amount in advance. When I sent a legal notice to him to execute the sale deed he replied that he had sold that land after my refusal. After paying 90% of the price of the land to its owner in advance, I have no right to get the property in my name. The person who has purchased that land is my friend and he was a witness in the agreement to sell. Please give me some advice.

Breach of agreement to sell : what action should be taken against the dealer

I entered into an agreement to sell with a land dealer to sell my land within one year from the date of registration of agreement. After the agreement the dealer has refused to perform his duty under the said agreement. In this kind of breach of agreement to sell, what action should be taken against the dealer? Can I sell this land to anyone despite this agreement to sell?

Can builder ask court to allow him to refund the buyer in installments

Can builder ask court to allow him to refund the buyer in installments. The litigation expenses and agony expenses. If yes, what counter arguments can be told to the judge to force him to pay me in lumpsum. Possibility is that the builder will default in installments after a while then what to do. It is a consumer case. What does RERA say about modus operandi of refund process by builder.  Are there any previous judgements on this process.