Further investigation is being conducted with mala-fide intention

My girlfriend has filed a false case of sexual harassment. She filed FIR under section 354 A of the Indian penal code. Indeed, she induced me to establish a sexual relationship with the sole purpose to extort money. I trapped on the web; I had sent some WhatsApp messages that exhibit my lust. She filed FIR for rape by those messages. She wants to extort money from me. Therefore, she made such false allegation. When I did not fulfil her demand, hence she made such allegation. I’m not committed any offence. Now the investigating officer has initiated a further investigation to collect evidence regarding…

My girlfriend has filed a false case of sexual harassment. She filed FIR under section 354 A of the Indian penal code. Indeed, she induced me to establish a sexual relationship with the sole purpose to extort money. I trapped on the web; I had sent some WhatsApp messages that exhibit my lust.

She filed FIR for rape by those messages. She wants to extort money from me. Therefore, she made such false allegation. When I did not fulfil her demand, hence she made such allegation. I’m not committed any offence.

Now the investigating officer has initiated a further investigation to collect evidence regarding the offence of rape. What could I do against the further investigation conducted by the investigating officer? Do I have any other remedy?

You said that charges are false because you did not commit any offence. As of now, the investigating officer has submitted a charge sheet under section 173 of crpc. It prima facie infers that there are some materials in support of the allegation. Generally, the investigating officer submits charge sheet upon collection of sufficient materials regarding the commission of the offence.

In the current scenario, you have one remedy to evade from the charge sheet. You can move a discharge petition when the court admits the charge sheet. The court is not bound to disclose charge sheet in toto; the court has to examine the charge sheet and the materials accompanied in addition to that. After that, court frames charges against the accused.

Accused has the opportunity to oppose the charges, framed by the court, on the ground that no sufficient materials are available in their support. It would help if you bore in mind that you cannot produce any evidence, but you have the right to invite the attention of court towards infirmities of the charge sheet.

Further investigation

As far as the further investigation is concerned, it is permissible on the discovery of new facts [State of Andhra Pradesh versus A.S. Peter (2008) 2 SCC 383]. The police have the right to further investigation under section 173(8) of the CrPC. Police can conduct a further investigation without an order of Magistrate because it is a statutory right of the police officer [Rama Chaudhary v. the State of Bihar, (2009) 6 SCC 346].

Further investigation is not a fresh investigation; it is a continuation of the earlier investigation. Hence, you have no remedy to stop further investigation. It is prerogative of the investigating officer.

If you think that charge sheet is baseless and bald, then you should challenge the same. If the charge sheet contains no cogent evidence in support of alleged offence, then the court must reject the charge sheet. You should move a discharge application and show that materials accompanied by charge sheet do not support the allegation.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.