Any person can lodge the FIR

Hi, My father purchased land in Madhugiri district five years back. The issue is the land record show inalienable for 15 years, but the same was in landlord records for many years, so he got permission and then registered. He told that new records would not have  “inalienable”, but it is still there. Please guide how can remove it.

Hi, My father purchased land in Madhugiri district five years back. The issue is the land record show inalienable for 15 years, but the same was in landlord records for many years, so he got permission and then registered. He told that new records would not have  “inalienable”, but it is still there. Please guide how can remove it.

The FIR is information about the commission of a cognisable offence. Section 154 CrPC provides the procedure for recording of First Information Report. The officer in charge of the polices station upon receiving the information bound by law to record it immediately.

Section 154 CrPC does not mandate that only victim of the crime shall record the FIR. Any person knowing the commission of offence can register the FIR. Hence, you did nothing which is unwarranted under the law. Moreover, you have performed a fundamental duty of the citizen to inform the police officer about the offence and set the criminal law in motion.

If information discloses the commission of a cognisable offence, it does not matter that who have given such information. In Parkash Singh Badal v. State of Punjab, (2007) 1 SCC 1 the Supreme Court held that the police officer can not embark upon an enquiry as to whether the information laid by the informant is reliable and genuine.

On the other hand, the officer in charge of a police station is statutorily obliged to register a case and then to proceed with the investigation if he has reason to suspect the commission of an offence. If the police officer refuses to register the FIR, he violates the statutory duty cast upon him.

You have filed an online FIR. It was the duty of the police officer to initiate the investigation. He should have proceeded to the place of the incident, but instead of it, he reached to the complainant’s and gave threats. The police officer has committed an offence of criminal intimidation. You may proceed against him and approach the Superintendent of Police. You should file a complaint against him and if possible approach the High Court under writ jurisdiction.

A police officer is the agent of state government. He represents the state. If he encroaches the fundamental right of a citizen, the state shall be liable therefor. Article 21 of the Constitution of India guarantees the personal liberty of every person. You can file a writ before the High Court under Article 226 for the compensation and taking stringent action against the delinquent police officer.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.