What to do against the false allegation

What should I do if someone is imposing the wrong section of IPC 506 charges against me who has not been done by me?

What should I do if someone is imposing the wrong section of IPC 506 charges against me who has not been done by me?

Criminal intimidation is an offence under section 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This non-cognisable and bailable offence. When criminal proceeding has initiated against you for criminal intimidation on the false ground, you have the right to challenge the legality of proceeding before the High Court.

The High Court has inherent power under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) to quash the false criminal proceeding. In  State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 the Supreme Court held that the court should exercise its inherent power either to prevent abuse of the process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice.

File false FIR or Complaint is indeed an example of abuse of the process of the court. Filing a false complaint is an offence under section 196 of the IPC. At this stage, you have to approach the High Court for protection against abuse of process. When a person files a false complaint, he abuses the process of the court [Amanullah v. State of Bihar, (2016) 6 SCC 699].

In the Bhajan Lal case, the Supreme Court held that when allegation made in FIR or complaint is so absurd, and no prudent person can ever reach a just conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused, then the court shall quash that proceeding.

You should file a petition before the High Court under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. If you have any documentary evidence to prove that the complaint is false and frivolous then it’ll be easy for the court to quash the proceeding. However, the court has the power to quash the proceeding sans any evidence. The court examines the complaint that prima facie any offence is made out of it. If the court finds that no crime is made out or the complaint is false, or allegation made with the ulterior motive to harass the petitioner, then the court shall quash the complaint.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.