Bank obtained my call detail record without my permission

Bank obtained my call detail record without my permission. Can Credit Card Recovery department get CDR of any person? I want to know that any recovery agent can call the other person to recover the amount by using the call details. The mobile provider company provides such call detail record (CDR), and the agent got this by another source. Now we want to Know is it legal or not and what I file an FIR or Complaint to police.

Bank obtained my call detail record without my permission. Can Credit Card Recovery department get CDR of any person? I want to know that any recovery agent can call the other person to recover the amount by using the call details. The mobile provider company provides such call detail record (CDR), and the agent got this by another source. Now we want to Know is it legal or not and what I file an FIR or Complaint to police.

Obtaining a call detail record (CDR) without permission of the subscriber is an act of breach of privacy. The law enforcement authority, for the security of the nation, takes CDR without the consent of the person. It is prime liability of the mobile service provider to maintain the privacy of its customer and do not disclose such information without his permission.

Right to privacy

Right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and infringement of such right is a violation of article 21. In this condition, you can initiate legal proceeding against the recovery agent as well as against the bank. The Supreme Court has held in several judgements that article 21 is enforceable against a private person. Therefore, the recovery agent, bank and mobile service provider are responsible for maintaining your privacy.

The call detail record is the private information.  You can claim compensation against them for breach of privacy. In Kadak Singh versus state of Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court has held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right and aggrieved person can claim compensation for search breach.

Hence, you should send a legal notice to the recovery agent, the bank and the mobile service provider for giving the compensation. After that, you can file a writ petition before the high court under article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.