Contradiction in dying declaration : chances of conviction

My brother is accused in a murder case. He is innocent but the police have falsely implicated him in this case. The dying declaration of the deceased does not support his role in the murder of Ramnaresh Kushwaha. There is a contradiction in the dying declaration so I want to know what is the chance of conviction of my brother? 

My brother is accused in a murder case. He is innocent but the police have falsely implicated him in this case. The dying declaration of the deceased does not support his role in the murder of Ramnaresh Kushwaha. There is a contradiction in the dying declaration so I want to know what is the chance of conviction of my brother? 

Dying declaration is an important piece of evidence under Section 32(2) of the Indian Evidence Act. The court can convict the accused on the sole evidence of dying declaration if it seems true. It is the duty of the prosecution to prove the dying declaration of the deceased. 

You said that there are contradictions in the dying declaration. If there are more dying declarations than one then it may have some contradions and the court will check the veracity of dying declarations. In case there is only one dying declaration then contradion is not possible. 

In the first sceneration the court may discard the dying declaration if the contradictions are major and significant. The court will reject the dying declaration and cannot convict the accused on such a dying declaration. Thus, the conviction will base upon the proof of other criminating evidence.  

In case of minor contradictions the court will not reject the dying declaration. Because, the witness has the tendency to refine his statement. 

Contradiction between dying declaration and other evidence

A dying declaration becomes contradictory if it does not get corroboration from the other independent evidence like post mortem report, evidence of eye witness etc. In this situation the court will not rely on the dying declaration but appreciate other evidence. 

This is not a rule that the court will acquit the accused on the suspicious dying declaration. Whereas, the court will convict the accused if the prosecution has successfully proved the culpability of the accused. The prosecution can prove the guilt of your brother by other evidence. So, I can't say that the court will acquit your brother because the dying declaration remains disproved. There is a good chance that the court will convict the accused on the evidence other than dying declaration. 

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.