How to take custody of my daughter from Nari Niketan?

My daughter has been living in Nari Niketan. She left our house and travelled to Agra by train. The RPF police Agra kept her in custody when she was wandering on the platform. Now the Railway Magistrate has sent her to Nari Niketan. How to take custody of my daughter from Nari Niketan? She is minor and of sound mind. Is there any procedure to bring her back home? The RPF has informed me that my daughter is living in the Nari Niketan Agra.

My daughter has been living in Nari Niketan. She left our house and travelled to Agra by train. The RPF police Agra kept her in custody when she was wandering on the platform. Now the Railway Magistrate has sent her to Nari Niketan. How to take custody of my daughter from Nari Niketan? She is minor and of sound mind. Is there any procedure to bring her back home? The RPF has informed me that my daughter is living in the Nari Niketan Agra.

In this situation you should move an application to the Railway Magistrate and demand custody of your daughter from Nari Niketan. Currently, Nari Niketan is a legal custodian of your child because of the order of the Magistrate. Hence, you cannot move a habeas corpus writ petition before the High Court. 

Taking custody of daughter from Nari Niketan

The matter is under the territorial jurisdiction of Railway Magistrate, Agra. Therefore, you should move an application in the court of Railway Magistrate, Agra. You should produce the summon and submit her birth certificate or any other document to prove that she is your daughter. 

If you have lodged an FIR under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, for missing your child then you must produce its copy to the Magistrate. However, in absence of FIR the court may grant custody of your daughter.

In absence of evidentiary proof that she is your daughter the Court will not pass an order to transfer custody of the child from Nari Niketan. 

Read also: How to release wife from her parent's custody

I think there is no dispute regarding custody. She is innocent, not connected with any crime, RPF personnel found her wandering on the platform, therefore, took her in custody. The facts of your case suggest that in the interest of justice her custody should be given to her parents. 

A balance has to be struck between the attachment and sentiments of the parties towards the minor children and the welfare of the minors which is of paramount importance.

R.V. Srinath Prasad vs. Nandamuri Jayakrishna, (2001) 4 SCC 71

If the Railway Magistrate refuses your application and retains her custody in the Nari Niketan, then you can move a writ petition to the High Court. In this condition, you have to file a habeas corpus writ. Such an order of Magistrate will render her custody illegal. Then you can approach the High Court for taking custody of your daughter from the Nari Neketan.

Read also: Action against illegal custody

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.