Limitation of criminal appeal against the order of acquittal 

What is the limitation of criminal appeal against the order of acquittal? If a victim files a criminal appeal under section 372 (provided) against acquittal before the court of session then what will be the limitation period for this? 

by Shivendra Pratap Singh | Oct 22, 2022 | Criminal Law

What is the limitation of criminal appeal against the order of acquittal? If a victim files a criminal appeal under section 372 (provided) against acquittal before the court of session then what will be the limitation period for this? 

Under Section 378(5) of the code of criminal procedure 1973, there is a period of limitation prescribed for appeal against acquittal. If the complainant is a private person then a period of limitation is 60 days from the date of order of acquittal. 

The proviso of Section 372 does prescribe the right to appeal by victim in case of acquittal or lesser punishment. It does not provide a period of limitation. Hence in respect of limitation the provision of Section 378(5) shall apply. 

If there is any sufficient cause for the delay then you can request the court to condone the delay. Move an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for the condonation of delay.  

Advocate's Profile

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Consult Online

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

Jul 3, 2026 | ,

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Apr 9, 2026 |

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Mar 5, 2026 |

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

Mar 2, 2026 |

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

Aug 10, 2025 |

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.