Can a person file complaint if FIR on the same offence has been quashed?

One of the Individuals filed a private complaint against me. Case was for change of Date of Grampanchayat assessment copy of house property from 2013 to 14. Same assessment was presented in the court by us for filing a suit against him for easmentry right. Court ordered for invitation under 156(3). FIR i.e. report filed by police in the court. Court passed order to re-registration of Report & private complaint is disposed of. Now complainant manage to got Case reregistration of private complaint with all other papers and Report, instead of only Report itself. We have received notice therefore appeared…

One of the Individuals filed a private complaint against me. Case was for change of Date of Grampanchayat assessment copy of house property from 2013 to 14. Same assessment was presented in the court by us for filing a suit against him for easmentry right. Court ordered for invitation under 156(3). FIR i.e. report filed by police in the court. Court passed order to re-registration of Report & private complaint is disposed of.

Now complainant manage to got Case reregistration of private complaint with all other papers and Report, instead of only Report itself. We have received notice therefore appeared in court. Question Now question is 1) Since private complaint is disposed of as per Order then how complaintant can register the same second time. 2) What will be our future stand to take. 3) Can case for Contempt of court Order be filled against complanent? 4) Matter is at Kolhapur Dist in Maharashtra, where to file? 5) What are other alternatives?

The complainant cannot register a complaint if the FIR in respect of the same facts and incident has been quashed by the High Court. Subsequent proceeding is illegal and against the judgement passed by the supreme Court in T. T.Antony v. State of Kerala 2001 SCC

Complainant has no power to initiate a second proceeding in the same offence. You should file an application in the High Court under Section 482 of the code of criminal procedure for quashing of FIR.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.