Quashing of first information report (FIR)

I want the quashing of the first information report (FIR). A false first information report FIR has been lodged against me by the university. There are three students who are working on a project in association with me. I am the senior most of them hence, has a privilege to check the progress report of […]

I want the quashing of the first information report (FIR). A false first information report FIR has been lodged against me by the university. There are three students who are working on a project in association with me. I am the senior most of them hence, has a privilege to check the progress report of others. Now the university says that I have prepared my thesis on the materials and data collected by the fellow researchers. I have the evidence to prove that allegations are false. I have kept the record of all data and findings of tests which are not related to the others. One advocate says that I should file a case in the high court under Section 482 crpc. Please help.

Asked from: Uttar Pradesh

Your advocate is giving wrong advise. The first information report does not quash under Section 482 of the code of criminal procedure (crpc). When the officer in charge of the police station records the FIR he forwards a copy of it to the competent judicial magistrate under Section 157 crpc.

At this stage the magistrate does not take cognisance because FIR is not a document of institution of a criminal case. In absence of the cognisance it cannot be said that a criminal proceeding is pending against the accused.

Consequently, the High Court does not entertain the petition for the quashing of FIR which is filed under Section 482 crpc. 

Quashing of first information report (FIR) under Article 226 

At this stage you should move a writ petition in the High Court under Article 226 of the constitution for the quashing of FIR. If you have evidence which prima facie proves that the accused (you) has not committed the alleged offence, the court may quash the FIR.

At this stage the court does not appreciate the evidence because the appreciation of evidence is the matter of trial. The first information report  is not an encyclopaedia of relevant facts [Rajesh Bajaj vs State (1999) 3 SCC 259]. Hence, the court does not examine the veracity of FIR. Court does wait until the filing of the charge sheet because more detailed and relevant facts are unearthed after the investigation. 

Read also: Is there limitation period for quashing of FIR?

Therefore, in the quashing petition, the High Court superficially examines the evidence which you produce along with the petition. You must bear in mind that the evidence which you want to produce for quashing the FIR must be capable of proving your innocence on the first impression. 

In S. M. Dutta vs State of Gujarat (2001) 7 SCC 659 the Supreme Court has held that “criminal proceedings, in the normal course of events ought not to be scuttled at the initial stage, unless the same amounts to an abuse of process of law.” 

You must satisfy the High Court that there is no incriminating evidence against you and the contents of FIR do not disclose commission of offence. In Bhajan Lal case the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that FIR should be quashed, if FIR does not disclose the commission of any offence and nor make out a case against the accused.

As you said that you have evidence to prove your innocence. Hence, you must move a writ petition under Article 226 of the constitution for quashing of FIR.

Also read: Quashing in Gangster Act

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.