Can I lodge FIR in discovery of new facts?

Sir presently retired from the bank service. Can I lodge FIR in discovery of new facts? During 2006 the insiders tried to fix me in a false case of misappropriation of excess cash/shortage of cash. The claim gained by illegal activities of stolen customer paying in slip and a customer cash paid cheque stolen from my custody. The stolen property was under the custody of the supervisor and senior manager. Misappropriation of claim gained by concealment in the bank computer. On false customer complaints and the senior manager complaint.  Bank appointed team of investigator and enquiry presenting officer. Jointly supported…

Sir presently retired from the bank service. Can I lodge FIR in discovery of new facts? During 2006 the insiders tried to fix me in a false case of misappropriation of excess cash/shortage of cash. The claim gained by illegal activities of stolen customer paying in slip and a customer cash paid cheque stolen from my custody. The stolen property was under the custody of the supervisor and senior manager. Misappropriation of claim gained by concealment in the bank computer. On false customer complaints and the senior manager complaint. 

Bank appointed team of investigator and enquiry presenting officer. Jointly supported a claim of misappropriation. All the claims earned by stolen paying in slips and a cheque from my custody. Virus is discovered by a bank directed to lodge a criminal complaint. The accused person's confession letter escaped from police investigation. The virus was discovered recently. Can I file a fresh fir against the bank and accused person's.

If the said incident happened due to malicious software or virus installed in computers of the bank then you can absolve from the alleged charges. In this situation the discovery of viruses in the computer system is an important fact. 

Therefore, recording of FIR becomes mandatory to unearth the truth. The confessional statement of the accused has been misplaced by the investigating officer of the bank in connivance with the accused. Hence, this new fact may prove who has misappropriated the cash.

A bug or virus has been discovered during the preliminary investigation of the investigator and presenting officer. If the bank does not take proper legal action i.e. to lodge a first information report under the Information Technology Act then you should lodge the FIR. 

FIR on discovery of new facts

This new fact constitutes a distinct offence. It may be possible that it has some link with the previous offence. But until the investigation starts and a report of an expert has not been received the link between accused and alleged crime could not be established. 

Hence, investigation is necessary in respect of this new criminal act. You should lodge an FIR in discovery of new facts unveiled during the inquiry. If the police refuse to lodge your FIR then you should move an application to the Magistrate under Section 156(3).

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.