Bail in rape cases against the minor girl

My brother has falsely been prosecuted for the offence of rape. The neighbour has lodged a FIR against him that he had committed rape while she was playing in the field. There was no evidence that she was playing in the field. No witness saw that the victim was playing in the field. That allegation is false and frivolous. The sessions judge has cancelled the bail on the ground that there is enough evidence that the accused has committed the offence. Now I am planning to approach the high court for the bail. Please suggest whether the high court can…

Bail in rape cases against the minor girl. My brother has falsely been prosecuted for the offence of rape. The neighbour has lodged a FIR against him that he had committed rape while she was playing in the field. There was no evidence that she was playing in the field. No witness saw that the victim was playing in the field. That allegation is false and frivolous. The sessions judge has cancelled the bail on the ground that there is enough evidence that the accused has committed the offence. Now I am planning to approach the high court for the bail. Please suggest whether the high court can grant bail in this matter?

The girl was minor at the time of commission of offence. Therefore, your brother has committed the offence under the special law i.e. Protection of Child from Sexual Offences Act. 

If the medical report suggests that the girl was sexually exploited or subjected to sexual assault then it would be very tough to get bail from the High Court. Generally the court does not grant bail in sexual offences committed against a minor child unless the investigation has not been completed. 

You should wait till the submission of the charge sheet under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (crpc). After submission of the charge sheet, the court may grant bail:

  • If there is no cogent evidence against the accused
  • When the prosecution failed to prove the incident
  • If prima facie no offence is made out against the accused
  • After filing of the charge sheet there is no apprehension that the accused may temper with the evidence or manipulate the witnesses
  • If the court thinks that accused is the sole bread earner and his incarceration may cause difficulty in contesting his case
  • There is no chance that the accused may not cooperate in the trial

If the investigating officer has recorded the statement of the victim under Section 164 crpc and there is medical evidence in support of the commission of offence, you should wait till the filing of the charge sheet.

You cannot take a plea that it was consensual sex because the girl (victim) is minor. The consent of minor is immaterial in the rape case. 

If there is no extreme urgency you should wait and let the investigating officer conclude the investigation. This is a special Act and bail is generally not granted by the court at the initial stage of investigation. 

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.