Violation of right to privacy as my uncle is getting my cdr and location 

Greetings sir/mam, Recently my parents expired and then me and my sister decided to come with my uncle but now he is creating problems for us by listening to or cdr and finding our location every single time we are not comfortable in this and no one will be please help how i can stop […]

Greetings sir/mam, Recently my parents expired and then me and my sister decided to come with my uncle but now he is creating problems for us by listening to or cdr and finding our location every single time we are not comfortable in this and no one will be please help how i can stop this.

Asked from: Manipur

Start by having an open and honest conversation with your uncle. Express your concerns and let him know how his actions are making you and your sister uncomfortable. Try to understand his perspective and see if there is a way to address the issues amicably.

Reach out to other relatives who may be able to mediate or help resolve the situation. They might be able to speak to your uncle and encourage him to respect your privacy and provide a more supportive environment for you and your sister. 

If the issues persist and you feel unsafe or threatened, it may be necessary to take legal recourse. If your uncle has any criminal intention then he has committed an offence of stalking. You may file a complaint/FIR against him.  

Remember, it's crucial to document any incidents or evidence of harassment or threats for future reference. Your safety and well-being are of utmost importance, so don't hesitate to reach out to professionals and authorities who can assist you in resolving this situation.

Also read: To some extent personal information can be revealed under RTI Act

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.