Wife intentionally delaying the trial of dowry case: what to do?

It is almost nine years now and I am fighting a Dowry case against me. Although my defence is strong, the other party is prolonging this case by making excuses and playing the victim card in from the judge. What remedies I can take to fast track this case?

Question: Wife intentionally delaying the trial of dowry case: what to do? It is almost nine years now and I am fighting a Dowry case against me. Although my defence is strong, the other party is prolonging this case by making excuses and playing the victim card in from the judge. What remedies I can take to fast track this case?

Your wife is intentionally delaying the trial of the dowry case by presenting herself as the victim. However, she knows that her case is false and frivolous. It seems from your case that the trial court is giving unnecessary adjournments to the prosecution. In this situation, you should approach the High Court either under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) or file a petition with the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, imposes a duty on every High Court to exercise continuous superintendence over the Trial Courts to ensure expeditious and proper disposal of case.

Article 227 of the Constitution also confers upon this Court the power of superintendence over all subordinate courts within its jurisdiction. The primary purpose of granting such wide supervisory powers to this Court is to remove obstructions that may impede the path of justice.

Obtaining unnecessary adjournments constitutes an abuse of the process of court. It is the solemn duty of this Court to prevent such abuse, rectify irregularities in the judicial process, and prevent miscarriages of justice.

Hence, you should avail any of the above-mentioned options to ensure the timely resolution of this case. The high court can direct the trial court to decide this case within a specified period, such as six months or any other period that the court deems appropriate.

If you have evidence to prove that the case is false and that the informant (your wife) has made false allegations, you can approach the High Court under Section 482 of the CrPC to request the quashing of the entire proceeding. This would be a preferable option if sufficient evidence has come to light that tends to demonstrate the case's falsehood.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.