Allegations of kidnapping and death threats: my father-in-law’s filed fir

Allegations of kidnapping and death threats: my father-in-law's filed fir. My father in law filed an FIR for the offence of kidnapping and threatening us if we return to our city. I solemnised marriage with my girlfriend when her father came to know about it and he has filed a criminal case against me. Our […]

Allegations of kidnapping and death threats: my father-in-law's filed fir. My father in law filed an FIR for the offence of kidnapping and threatening us if we return to our city. I solemnised marriage with my girlfriend when her father came to know about it and he has filed a criminal case against me. Our marriage is against the will of my father in law. He is an influential person and has good contacts in the administration. We are very afraid about the consequences when we go to our city. My parents are trying to settle this matter by engaging him to talk about the matter in the presence of respectable members of our society but failed to achieve anything.

Asked from: Uttar Pradesh

In this situation you need protection against the threatening and harassment from the police authorities. If you both are an major and of sound mind you have the right to solemnise marriage without consent of parents. FIR is not maintainable because no offence of abduction is made out in your case. 

No need to file a counter case against the father in law. You should file a writ petition in the high court under Article 226 of the constitution of India for seeking protection order. No need to file habeas corpus writ because in these circumstances it is not maintainable as per the dictum of Kanu Sanyal vs DM Darjeeling, AIR 1979 SC 814.

You should file a writ petition because allegations of kidnapping is false. In the judgment and dictum of Lata Singh versus State of Uttar Pradesh (2006) 5 SCC 475 you are entitled to seek protection against such a threatening and false FIR, the High Court may direct the Superintendent of Police of your district to provide protection while you stay in your city. Additionally, the court may instruct the SP not to arrest the petitioner i.e. you in pursuance of the FIR. For more legal help please visit Kanoon India.

Related: Boyfriend threatening and causing violence: How to protect my girl?

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.