Lapses in the investigation under SC/ST Act

Lapses in the investigation under SC/ST Act. In a case under the SC/ST Act, a sub-inspector conducted the investigation, while the Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) merely signed the chargesheet without visiting the scene of the crime, conducting physical investigations, or gathering statements and evidence. Proxy investigation was carried out by the sub-inspector, and the […]

Lapses in the investigation under SC/ST Act. In a case under the SC/ST Act, a sub-inspector conducted the investigation, while the Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) merely signed the chargesheet without visiting the scene of the crime, conducting physical investigations, or gathering statements and evidence. Proxy investigation was carried out by the sub-inspector, and the ACP's signatures on documents lacked memo numbers and seals. The victim did not receive protection under Section 164 of the CrPC, while witnesses for the accused did. The police also removed the SC/ST sections from all accused individuals and omitted the prime accused's name from the chargesheet.

Subsequently, the lower district court disposed of the case, removing the SC/ST sections, and transferred it to another court. Meanwhile, the accused and their associates filed numerous counter cases against the SC/ST victim. This situation calls for urgent attention and intervention.

Asked from: Uttar Pradesh

The trial court is not bound to accept the charge sheet submitted by the investigating officer. If there are a lot of lapses in the investigation, the trial court, instead of taking cognisance of the offence, should pass an order for reinvestigation. However, lapses in the investigation does not give any advantage to the accused but the trial court has the duty to check the veracity of investigation.

In your case, reinvestigation is mandatory for the ends of justice. You should file a protest petition before the same trial court where the case has been transferred. It is not clear from your question whether the case has been transferred after the framing of charges or not. Lapses in the investigation under SC/ST Act is a matter of concern, therefore, you should immediately take measures to ensure just and fair investigation.

If the case has been transferred after the framing of charges, you should move a petition in the High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for a stay of the proceedings and for reinvestigation. For more legal help please visit Kanoon India.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.