Revision application against dismissal of complaint

Mr X presented a complaint against me for the commencement of offence punishable under section 467/468/504/506 IPC, which is rejected by the court of the magistrate. Now Mr X submitted a revision application against such rejection. I want to appear in that revision application. Is there any law in this regard?

Mr X presented a complaint against me for the commencement of offence punishable under section 467/468/504/506 IPC, which is rejected by the court of the magistrate. Now Mr X submitted a revision application against such rejection. I want to appear in that revision application. Is there any law in this regard?

Yes, you may appear before the court in that revision application. According to section 401(2) of the code of criminal procedure [crpc], the court shall not take any decision unless giving an opportunity of hearing to the accused person.

You are a proposed accused in this case because the court rejects the complaint of Mr X. However, the proposed accused also has the right to invoke section 401(2) crpc. It does not matter that the court did not issue any process like summons or warrant against the accused.

Section 401(1) CrPC

In the case of any proceeding the record of which has been called for by itself or Which otherwise comes to its knowledge, the High Court may, in its discretion, exercise any of the powers conferred on a Court of Appeal by sections 386, 389, 390 and 391 or on a Court of Session by section 307 and, when the Judges composing the Court of revision are equally divided in opinion, the case shall be disposed of in the manner provided by section 392.

Section 401[2] No order under this section shall be made to the prejudice of the accused or another person unless he has had an opportunity of being heard either personally or by pleader in his defence.

In A.N. Santhanam vs K. Elangovan [2012] 12 SCC; the Supreme Court of India holds that proposed accused has the right to appear in revision application against the dismissal of the complaint. In Priyanka Srivastava vs the State of U.P. [2015] 3 SCC supreme court of India directed all the subordinate courts to take affidavit in support of allegations made in the application under section 156[3] crpc as well as applicable under section 200 crpc. The purpose of the oath is to bound the applicant with his averments stated in the application.

In M. M. Kakadia vs S. M. Patel [2013] 1 SCC Criminal; proposed accused has right to hear in the revision application preferred by the complainant against the order of dismissal of the complaint under section 203 crpc.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.