Tender of pardon under section 306 crpc

My younger brother is prosecuted for the offence of robbery by Banglore police. The offence is committed by his friends and he was bounded by his friends to take participation in the commencement of offence. At the stage of the investigation, police offered him to convert in government witness. He accepted that offer and file application before the trial court. But unfortunately, his application has been rejected by the court. Is there any legal provision to file an appeal?

by Shivendra Pratap Singh | Apr 4, 2016 | Criminal Law

My younger brother is prosecuted for the offence of robbery by Banglore police. The offence is committed by his friends and he was bounded by his friends to take participation in the commencement of offence. At the stage of the investigation, police offered him to convert in government witness. He accepted that offer and file application before the trial court. But unfortunately, his application has been rejected by the court. Is there any legal provision to file an appeal?

A co-accused cannot be tendered pardon under section 306 crpc if he was not involved in the crime as an active offender. The object behind tendering pardon to one of the co-accused is to obtain all the evidence regarding the commencement of offence if prosecution lacks sufficient evidence to the guilt of the accused. So the accused seeks pardon must prove before the court that he took part in the commission of the offence as an active member. He knows all the facts and circumstances of the case and he could be a worthy witness for the prosecution.

When an application for tendering pardon is filed by one of the accused without taking permission of the prosecution it shall not be entertained by the court.

In Lt. Commander vs State of Maharashtra AIR 1968 SC, it is held by the Supreme Court of India that if the application is filed by the accused for tendering pardon it should be forwarded by the court to the prosecuting agency for its comments/opinion. The court should not pass an order without the opinion of the prosecution. If the prosecution is agreed and also seek pardon of the co-accused then the court shall decide his application.

In A. Devendran vs State of Tamilnadu AIR 1998 SC, it is held by the court that accused must be worthy for the prosecution and prosecution should be in a condition that rest of the accused cannot be punished without the testimony of any one of the co-accused.

The decision of the court to dismiss your brother’s application for tendering of pardon under section 306 is correct. You cannot get any relief in appeal or revision because :

  • The prosecution did not give its opinion regarding a pardon.
  • He is not an active member in the commission of the offence.
  • He also does not know all the facts of the offence.
  • He is not a worthy witness for the prosecution.
  • He just wants immunity from the punishment
Author's Profile

Tags: Criminal Law

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Consult Online

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Apr 9, 2026 |

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Mar 5, 2026 |

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

Mar 2, 2026 |

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

Aug 10, 2025 |

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Jun 15, 2025 |

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.