Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a bank fails to comply with a compromise order passed by the Lok Adalat despite receiving the settled amount. It discusses enforcement of the award, execution proceedings, contempt-related remedies, and the legal course available against arbitrary action of the bank.

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat which was passed upon the compromise. There was a dispute regarding the payment of credit card outstanding. The matter was resolved and I deposited the amount fixed by the bank after deliberation. Then the court has forwarded our case to the Mega Lok Adalat. After passing of the award the bank has sent a notice to me for readjustment of the outstanding amount. When I refused to pay that additional amount the bank lodged a FIR against me by stating that I had concealed that amount of loan to the bank. 

Asked from: Uttar Pradesh

Once the loan has been closed and the award has been passed by the Lok Adalat with the consent of both parties, any criminal proceedings initiated by the bank become non-est. There is no justification for initiating criminal proceedings against you after the final settlement of the dispute.

As per Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, the award of Lok Adalat is treated as a decree. In K. N. Govindakutti (2012) 2 SCC 51, the Supreme Court held that every award of Lok Adalat is deemed to be a decree of a civil court and is, therefore, executable by the civil court.

You should file an execution petition in the civil court to enforce the award of Lok Adalat. If the bank has any objections to the award, it may raise them in the execution proceedings. After filing the execution petition, you should also file a writ petition in the High Court to quash the FIR.

Once both parties have amicably settled their dispute, no further proceedings can be initiated on the same cause of action. This is purely a civil dispute, and hence, no criminal proceedings can be instituted against the parties involved. The High Court shall quash the FIR on the above basis.

Tags: FIR | Lok Adalat

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

This legal guidance explains the legal consequences and subsequent proceedings arising after an arbitration award or order in an arbitration matter. It discusses enforcement of the award, challenge proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, execution remedies, limitation periods, and the jurisdiction of courts in post-award disputes.

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a civil court dismisses a suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It discusses return of plaint under the Civil Procedure Code, refiling before the competent court, limitation protection, and the legal consequences arising from adjudication by a court lacking jurisdiction.

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

This legal guidance explains whether admission obtained under the NRI quota can subsequently be altered, cancelled, or converted to another category. It discusses eligibility conditions, consequences of misrepresentation, university regulations, refund issues, and the legal remedies available against arbitrary cancellation or change of admission status.

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

This article discusses whether a claim arising out of a motor accident can be pursued before a Consumer Forum in addition to or instead of proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). It examines the maintainability of such claims under consumer protection law, the liability of insurance companies, and the distinction between deficiency in service and statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Can I sue a person if the contract is unregistered?

This article discusses whether a civil suit can be maintained on the basis of an unregistered agreement or contract. It examines the legal effect of non-registration under the Registration Act, the distinction between admissibility and enforceability of documents, and the circumstances in which an unregistered document may still be relied upon for collateral purposes or for seeking specific relief before a civil court.