Builder not providing parking spot as per the approved plan

by Shivendra Pratap Singh | Sep 22, 2023 | Civil Matters

Builder not providing parking spot as per the approved plan. Of the total parking slots allotted, two flats, 1503 and (705-6) are allotted spots on ‘humanitarian grounds.’ These two homes pay INR 2500+ per month for parking. Nominal parking rates in the building are Rs 200 per month. These houses with nominal parking rates have bought/included a parking spot as part of their main agreement itself. Currently no parking in the building is under stilt or in the garage. All cars are parked in the open and have no assigned/designated spots. In 2017, a SGM resolution was passed to take parking charges from flat 1503 (mine) as part of monthly maintenance. However, since Jan 2023, I have been asked to pay these charges in advance.

Parking charges have been paid up to September 2023 in two instalments. Both the above instalments have been paid under ‘delayed circumstance’ due to the ongoing discussions to add, A total of 45 parking spots have been approved by BMC K-Ward and 1 each has been made available to tenants/members in houses with carpet area above 70 M.sq. One of the two houses is mine, aka 1503. (can share the exhibit if needed) My question therefore is:

1. Can the builder and later the society make allocations against the BMC’s approved list? 2. If yes, can I as owner and member of flat 1503 – question the MC/society and get my parking spot back? 3. Can the MC charge different rates for parking spots, those given via agreement and to those on ‘humanitarian grounds’? How do I fight this and what precedences and legal recourse do I have? Details: I am the house owner. The house is in Andheri, Mumbai, Maharashtra The building has two banks – which have been allocated 10 instead of 7 spots as per BMC approved list (can share if needed).

The builder, as well as the society, cannot allocate parking spot in violation of the approved plan. If the BMC has approved 45 parking slots, each for the flat above the carpet area of seventy square meters, then the builder is obligated to allocate them accordingly along with the sale deed.

Asked from: Maharashtra

You are entitled to receive a parking spot for your flat 1503, as per the approval granted by the BMC. The allocation of one parking spot is an integral part of the sale deed if the carpet area of the flat exceeds seventy square meters.

According to Section 2(a-1) of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (Act), the definition of a flat includes a garage (parking slot), which constitutes premises forming part of the building.

As per the approval given by the BMC, each flat above the carpet area of seventy square meters shall have a parking spot. Consequently, the parking spot becomes an integral component of the flat/apartment. Any breach of such approval contravenes the provisions of the Act, and therefore, an aggrieved person, such as yourself, can take legal action against the builder/society. Such an act is illegal and causes irreparable loss and injury to the flat owner, i.e., you.

Charging different fees for parking slot is a separate matter if the vehicles have been parked in common areas. The society/builder can charge varying fees if they are providing additional facilities. However, allocating common areas for exclusive parking is unlawful, as that area cannot be allotted separately.

Generally, the society charges extra fees for parking in common areas based on the rule of necessity (although it is illegal, it is done for the common interest of residents). If they are charging different fees for parking slots, such classification between different parking spots must be just, fair, and reasonable.

You can take legal action against your builder/society (as the case may be) either by filing a complaint with the appropriate authority of the BMC because they are violating the approved plan or by filing a complaint in the district consumer forum due to a deficiency in service on the part of the builder.

Related

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat

Bank refused to obey the order of Lok Adalat which was passed upon the compromise. There was a dispute regarding the payment of credit card outstanding. The matter was resolved and I deposited the amount fixed by the bank after deliberation. Then the court has…

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter

Subsequent proceedings in arbitration matter and challenge of award passed by the arbitrator. I want to challenge arbitral award, so I want to know how to challenge that award? There was dispute regarding enhancement of construction work. The tender was allotted in…

Civil court dismissed suit for want of jurisdiction

Civil court has dismissed suit for the want of jurisdiction and said that the suit should have been filled before the labour court. My claim was to recover money from the sugar factory who has withheld my arrears. The court expressed its view that the subject matter…

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards

Admission in NRI quota can be changed afterwards if the student comes under the scheme of children of Indian workers of gulf countries? I took admission in NRI quota at very high fees. There is a scheme of the government which provides that children of workers of…

Claim related to motor accident in consumer forum

Can I make a claim related to motor accidents in a consumer forum? My father died in an accident due to reckless driving of the car.  He hired that car to travel from our home to Chennai. When the vehicle reached XX the driver stopped the car at the restaurant…