Can a fraud case be filed against someone who is not a citizen of India?

Question: I am creating online content and uploading it on the various websites. One of my client resides in United Kingdom. He has ordered to write thirty unique contents per months for his website. I have done this work but he refuses to pay for them. He has committed fraud and prepared from me several […]

Question: I am creating online content and uploading it on the various websites. One of my client resides in United Kingdom. He has ordered to write thirty unique contents per months for his website. I have done this work but he refuses to pay for them. He has committed fraud and prepared from me several contents on the false promise. Can a fraud case be filed against someone who is not a citizen of India?

Asked from: Bihar

Yes, a fraud case can be filed against someone who is not a citizen of India, as long as the alleged fraud occurred within India or involved Indian citizens or entities. The jurisdiction of Indian courts extends to cases where the cause of action, or the event giving rise to the claim, has occurred within the territory of India.

However, there are some additional considerations when the accused is not a citizen of India. The Indian legal system has no jurisdiction over foreign citizens outside of India, and therefore the accused would have to be physically present in India in order to be tried in an Indian court. If the accused is not present in India, the Indian court may request the accused's country of citizenship to assist in the arrest and extradition of the accused to India.

It's also worth noting that the process of extradition, in case the accused is not present in India, can be a complicated and time-consuming process, and it will require the cooperation of the accused's country of citizenship.

Territorial jurisdiction in IPC

The Indian Penal Code (IPC) is the main criminal code of India, which applies to all citizens of India and to all persons on Indian territory, regardless of their nationality. The IPC lays down the general principles of criminal law and defines a wide range of criminal offenses, including those related to murder, theft, and fraud, among others.

The territorial jurisdiction of the Indian courts in relation to the IPC is determined by the place where the offense was committed. If the effect of a particular offence is committed in India the Indian court has the territorial jurisdiction to try that offence. According to the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), Indian courts have jurisdiction over an offense if the offense was committed:

  • Within the local limits of the court's jurisdiction
  • On a journey or voyage to or from India
  • In a place that is within the exclusive jurisdiction of India
  • On a ship or aircraft registered in India

Additionally, Indian courts have jurisdiction over offenses committed by Indian citizens or residents outside of India, if the offense is punishable under Indian law and if the accused is found within the territory of India.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.