Can any person forge my flat Sale Deed just by knowing the flat number and address?

Can any person forge my flat Sale Deed just by knowing the flat number and address. Can someone who knows my flat number and address, not having details of my property paper's, can make a forged document. Try to sell my flat by applying for a Certified Copy (not having any Xerox papers of my flat) just flat number name of owner and address, and not knowing the date of registration of my flat) , is such fraud possible?

Can any person forge my flat Sale Deed just by knowing the flat number and address. Can someone who knows my flat number and address, not having details of my property paper's, can make a forged document. Try to sell my flat by applying for a Certified Copy (not having any Xerox papers of my flat) just flat number name of owner and address, and not knowing the date of registration of my flat) , is such fraud possible?

A forged document is forged one irrespective of the fact that the maker of the document actually knew the facts of the original document. If you have information that a person has forged your property papers then you should immediately lodge an FIR against that person. 

Forgery is a cognisable offence therefore, you have the right to lodge an FIR. If the police officer finds that there is prima facie evidence that forgery (making forge sale deed) has been committed then he shall initiate the investigation. The investigating officer shall arrest the accused and collect all the evidence. 

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.