Can I file criminal case in Noida against company situated in Chennai

I reside in Noida, Sector 20, and have been employed by a Chennai-based company for the past six months. Unfortunately, they have withheld my salary on unsubstantiated grounds. Is it possible for me to file a criminal FIR online, ideally without the necessity of traveling to Chennai?

Can I file criminal case in Noida against company situated in Chennai. I reside in Noida, Sector 20, and have been employed by a Chennai-based company for the past six months. Unfortunately, they have withheld my salary on unsubstantiated grounds. Is it possible for me to file a criminal FIR online, ideally without the necessity of traveling to Chennai?

Yes, you can file a criminal case in Noida, regardless of the fact that the company is originally situated in Chennai. This is because a portion of the offense has taken place in Noida, allowing you to lodge a First Information Report (FIR) against the company in Noida.

According to Section 178 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when an offense is committed partly in one local area and partly in another, the FIR can be lodged in either of those areas.

In terms of jurisdiction for registering and investigating the crime, it is essential that a portion of the offense occurs within the territorial jurisdiction of the local police station. Section 177 of the CrPC specifies that the act constituting an offense must occur within the jurisdiction of the respective Magistrate for them to take cognizance. However, Section 178 of the CrPC holds that even if only a part of the cause of action has arisen within a jurisdiction, it is sufficient to initiate criminal proceedings against the accused person.

Section 178 of the CrPC takes precedence over Section 177, meaning that when a part of the cause of action has arisen, it is adequate to commence criminal proceedings.

Section 177 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, pertains to the ordinary place of inquiry or trial, whereas Section 178 of the CrPC addresses the place of inquiry or trial when it is uncertain in which of several local areas an offense was committed, or when an offense is committed partially in one local area and partially in another. You can lodge FIR in Noida without hesitation.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.