Can I lodge an FIR after ten years of incident?

My boyfriend had raped me in my PG when I was studying in engineering college. Now I have joined a multinational company and am working in Bangalore. He has traced me and is now trying to establish a relationship. I am married and a mother of two childs. Can I lodge an FIR after ten years of incident? I want to take stern action against him. He is a womaniser and exploiting women sexually and emotionally. 

Can I lodge an FIR after ten years of incident? My boyfriend had raped me in my PG when I was studying in engineering college. Now I have joined a multinational company and am working in Bangalore. He has traced me and is now trying to establish a relationship. I am married and a mother of two childs. Can I lodge an FIR after ten years of incident? I want to take stern action against him. He is a womaniser and exploiting women sexually and emotionally. 

There is no limitation period if offence is punishable with imprisonment of three or more years. Rape is punishable with regorous imprisonment with not less than ten years. Hence, delay in lodging FIR does not matter in respect ot rape cases. 

Therefore, you can lodge a first information report (FIR) against him under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. But you have to prove that he has committed rape. If you fail to prove sexual intercourse without your consent then the court will acquit him.

After ten years of incident no physical marks will be found on your body. You are a married woman, hence, your hymen has already ruptured. Therefore, the investigating officer will not get any kind of forensic evidence from your body. 

Thus, your case is entirely based upon circumstantial evidence. However, oral statement of prosecutrix is sufficient in rape case to lodge FIR. But the burden of proof lies upon the prosecutrix. 

If you have any evidence to prove that he had committed rape then you should proceed further. Otherwise you should drop your idea to lodge FIR after ten years of incident. 

If he commits a fresh offence like stalking then you should lodge an FIR against him. In that FIR you can club the offence of rape which had committed ten years back. Because you can prove his conduct and criminal intention.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.