Can I sell my property after passing of decree in a civil suit?

In 2017, a property dispute was settled by a decree in my favor by the honorable civil court, and there are currently no stay orders associated with the property in question. The petitioner has filed an appeal in the senior division, which is currently pending before the court. There are no pending litigations recorded in the registry office. Now, we are interested in selling a share of the property in question. Is it permissible to sell the share of the suite property? Alternatively, can we transfer the share to another partner of the suite property? I kindly request your guidance…

Question: Can I sell my property after passing of decree in a civil suit? In 2017, a property dispute was settled by a decree in my favor by the honorable civil court, and there are currently no stay orders associated with the property in question. The petitioner has filed an appeal in the senior division, which is currently pending before the court. There are no pending litigations recorded in the registry office. Now, we are interested in selling a share of the property in question. Is it permissible to sell the share of the suite property? Alternatively, can we transfer the share to another partner of the suite property? I kindly request your guidance and opinion on this matter.

The property is still a suit property; however, the appellate court has not passed any stay order regarding the execution of decree. In this situation, you can sell the property without the consent of the appellate court.

A transfer pendente lite is not illegal ipso jure but remains subservient to the pending litigation. In Nagubai Ammal v. B. Shama Rao [AIR 1956 SC 593] the Supreme Court while interpreting Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act observed that:

the words ‘so as to affect the rights of any other party thereto under any decree or order which may be made therein’, make it clear that the transfer is good except to the extent that it might conflict with rights decreed under the decree or order. It is in this view that transfers pendente lite have been held to be valid and operative as between the parties thereto.

AIR 1956 SC 593 page: 602, para 25

Therefore, there are no legal obstacles preventing the transfer of the property in question, either through a sale deed or by transferring it to another co-owner of the property. You have the freedom to choose the method by which you wish to transfer the property.

 

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Lessor has refused to renew the lease even after receiving entire rent

A business owner in Gujarat faces a legal notice to vacate after their landlord refused to renew a lease, despite accepting rent in advance. Legal experts clarify that payment does not constitute an automatic renewal when written permission is required. While the lease terminates by efflux of time, the tenant may negotiate for sufficient relocation time.

My neighbor has constructed a 6 to 7-foot compound wall

This legal guidance explains the remedies available where a neighbour has raised a high compound wall obstructing light, air, access, or causing nuisance to adjoining property owners. It discusses municipal complaints, civil injunction suits, easement rights, and legal action that may be initiated against unauthorized construction.

My neighbor is constructing a house adjoining to my compound wall

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a neighbour constructs a building adjoining the compound wall without maintaining the required setback. It discusses municipal complaints, easement rights relating to light and air, temporary injunctions, and civil remedies available to prevent unauthorized or nuisance-causing construction.

Suit dismissed for defect in parties

This legal guidance explains the consequences of dismissal of a civil suit due to non-joinder or misjoinder of necessary parties. It discusses the remedy of impleading proper parties, restoration or refiling of the suit, amendment of pleadings, and the legal principles governing defect in parties under the Civil Procedure Code.