Can police arrest in 120 B IPC when I am on anticipatory bail

Sir, I am accused in a criminal case The case is registered under 419,420,467,468, 506 IPC. I got anticipated bail from the court of sessions. The investigating officer has added section 120B IPC and the investigation is still going on. Can police arrest me under 120B IPC?

Sir, I am accused in a criminal case The case is registered under 419,420,467,468, 506 IPC. I got anticipated bail from the court of sessions. The investigating officer has added section 120B IPC and the investigation is still going on. Can police arrest me under 120B IPC?

When the investigating officer added section 120B IPC it proves that he has collected some evidence. The police can arrest you if he thinks that you can provide some more evidence. This is the privilege of the investigating officer and the court does not interfere. 

You have been enlarged on anticipatory bail so it appears that you are not directly involved in the crime. The police can arrest you if he has some convincing evidence. He has to approach the court for the cancellation of anticipatory bail.

Cancellation of anticipatory bail

The court includes some conditions while granting the anticipatory bail under section 438 crpc. Compliance of those conditions is mandatory for the accused. If the accused does not comply with those conditions the court will cancel his bail.

In Dolat Ram v. State of Haryana [(1995) 1 SCC 349: 1995 SCC (Cri) 237] the Supreme Court has laid some guidelines for cancellation of anticipatory bail.

  • Interference with the administration of justice.
  • Evasion or attempt to evade the due course of justice.
  • Abuse of the concession granted to the accused.
  • If the court thinks that the accused may abscond.
  • Another reason justifying the cancellation of bail

Can police arrest in 120B IPC

Section 120B does not enhance the gravity of the crime. Therefore, the court will not cancel your bail only on the addition of section 120B. You must follow the conditions specified in the anticipatory bail. 

In Hazari Lal Das v. State of W.B., (2009) 10 SCC 652; the Supreme Court held that the court should not mechanically cancel the bail unless the supervening circumstances require.

You should not be a worry. The court shall not cancel the bail unless you breach the condition. Addition of section 120B does not come under the purview of supervening circumstances.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.