Claim juvenile at any stage

Could a juvenile accused claim his juvenility at any stage of proceeding? A fact that accused was juvenile at the time of the commission of the offence is the most important fact. This fact can be raised at any stage of a criminal proceeding. Trial, appeal and revision are the stages of a criminal proceeding and accused can take the plea of juvenility at any stage.

by Shivendra Pratap Singh | Aug 19, 2015 | Criminal Law

Could a juvenile accused claim his juvenility at any stage of proceeding? A fact that accused was juvenile at the time of the commission of the offence is the most important fact. This fact can be raised at any stage of a criminal proceeding. Trial, appeal and revision are the stages of a criminal proceeding and accused can take the plea of juvenility at any stage.It does not matter that it was not raised in trial and the first time is taken in appeal or revision proceeding. If a sentence is passed against the accused in absence of the fact that the accused was juvenile, accused can take the plea of juvenility in an appeal against the sentence.If the sentence is passed and accused has been in jail for many years, he can file appeal, revision or file Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court and take his plea of juvenility. Maximum imprisonment is prescribed for a juvenile offender is of three years.In Upendra Pradhan v. State of Orissa (2015) SCC, it is held by the Supreme Court that:“The plea can be raised before any Court and at any point of time…… we will look into the present petition keeping in mind the juvenility of the accused-appellant at the time of the commission of the crime….. it has been brought to our notice that the appellant has undergone about 8 years in jail.The appellant falls within the definition of “juvenile” under Section 2(k) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of children) Act, 2000. Upendra Pradhan has undergone almost 8 years of the sentence, which is more than the maximum period of three years prescribed under Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000. Thus, giving him the benefit under the Act, and the appellant be released forthwith.”This similar view is taken by the Supreme Court in Ram Narain vs State of Uttar Pradesh (2015) SLP 1446/2004 in this case accused was undergoing sentence for 10 years and he raised the plea of juvenility first time before Supreme Court through SLP.
Author's Profile

Tags: Criminal Law

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Consult Online

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Apr 9, 2026 |

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Mar 5, 2026 |

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

Mar 2, 2026 |

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

Aug 10, 2025 |

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Jun 15, 2025 |

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.