Criminal case for kissing a girl

Father of a girl has filed a criminal case against me for kissing her. Now the complainant wants to compromise with an apology. Ninety days have completed but the investing officer did file a charge sheet. How much time does the investigating officer take to close this case. Sir, whether the court or police officer will close my case? I want to close this case as early as possible because I’m mentally disturbed. What is the process to close this case earlier? Can I quash this case?

Father of a girl has filed a criminal case against me for kissing her. Now the complainant wants to compromise with an apology. Ninety days have completed but the investing officer did file a charge sheet. How much time does the investigating officer take to close this case. Sir, whether the court or police officer will close my case? I want to close this case as early as possible because I’m mentally disturbed. What is the process to close this case earlier? Can I quash this case?

Kissing is an act of sexual harassment u/s 354-A IPC. This is an offence punishable under Section 354-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). You have committed an offence of sexual harassment. Physical contact with sexual overture is an act of sexual harassment. This is a grave invasion of personal liberty. 

You have intentionally touched another person with sexual overture. Touching a body of a woman with advancement of sexual overture constitutes offence of sexual harassment. The mens rea (criminal intention) of the offence is the intention to touch. Your conduct is sexual per se.

The victim (girl) would have given her statement under Section 164 of the code of criminal procedure (crpc). That statement is a relevant piece of evidence and it is sufficient to hold you guilty if it gets corroboration from some independent evidence. The investigation officer also recorded her statement. Hence, prosecution has sufficient evidence to prove that you have kissed her. 

Sexual harassment (Section 354-A) is a non-compoundable offence

Sexual harassment is a non-compoundable offence hence, compromise is not possible. The court will not grant permission to compromise this case. Statement of victims is a very strong evidence in sexual harassment case. Therefore, your conviction is apparent in the criminal case of kissing a girl. 

You have been on bail hence, the mandatory time period for filing of charge sheet will not apply in your case. The investigating officer will submit the charge sheet after its completion. There is no time period for submission of a charge sheet if the accused is being on bail.    

Neither the police nor the court will close this case. The court will acquit you only if prosecution fails to prove your guilt beyond reasonable doubt. If the victim becomes hostile in the trial or does not produce cogent or sufficient evidence of kissing then you can get benefit of doubt. 

Quashing of sexual harassment case

You are an accused in a criminal case for kissing a girl without her consent. The statement of the victim is itself sufficient to lodge the First Information Report (FIR). The prosecution also gets the statement of victim under section 164 crpc immediately after lodging the FIR. Hence, there is sufficient material on the record to show that you have committed the said offence. 

In this situation, the High Court will not quash this case under section 482 of the crpc. If the High Court finds that there is a prima facie case made out against the accused then it will not quash the criminal proceeding. The Supreme Court has given seven guidelines for quashing criminal cases. 

Your case does not fall in any of those guidelines hence, you will get no relief from the High Court. Don’t waste time in seeking quashing of this criminal case of kissing.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.