Cruelty committed in UK by NRI husband

My husband is a British citizen, and I’m his wife, an Indian citizen. We married on 6 May 2018 in India. After that, my husband was doing my visa of UK when he left India after marriage to the UK. I got my UK visa I went to the UK, and I lived there for two months. There I was harassed by my husband. Then I said to my parents living in India, and then I was called to India by my parents, and my husband and I came to India. Moreover, then my husband went back to Uk without informing me, and…

My husband is a British citizen, and I’m his wife, an Indian citizen. We married on 6 May 2018 in India. After that, my husband was doing my visa of UK when he left India after marriage to the UK. I got my UK visa I went to the UK, and I lived there for two months.

There I was harassed by my husband. Then I said to my parents living in India, and then I was called to India by my parents, and my husband and I came to India. Moreover, then my husband went back to Uk without informing me, and now I m in India, and my husband is in the UK, and he is not receiving my call and messages. No support from there family and his whole family is not accepting my request and message. My mobile, passport and document are with my husband. Please, can you help me with what I could do?

No doubt, your husband has committed the offence of cruelty punishable under section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code. But, he is a British citizen and more importantly he committed the said offence in the UK. Hence, the Indian court lacks territorial jurisdiction in your case.

Section 4 of the Indian Penal Code confers jurisdiction upon Indian courts if a foreign citizen commits the offence. A foreigner is triable in India if he determines crime in

  • India or
  • on any ship or aircraft registered in India

In your case, the cruelty took place in the UK thus the matter is beyond the jurisdiction of Indian courts. If you move a complaint before the court for the offence of cruelty, then it shall be rejected by the court for want of jurisdiction [Fatma Bibi Ahmed Patel v. State of Gujarat, (2008) 6 SCC 789]

If few acts of cruelty were committed in India and remain to continue in the UK; then you can file a complaint in India. In other words, if the act committed in the UK is the part of the same transaction or furtherance of cruelty committed in India, then Indian court can take cognisance. Upon fulfilment of the above conditions, the court will have jurisdiction to take notice of your case. [Gyan Singh v. State of Rajastha (2000) DMC 634]

If you establish the authority of Indian court over the matter, then you can move complaint not only for the offence of cruelty but you can also move a complaint under

  • Domestic Violence Act
  • Section 406 IPC (for withholding your documents)

You should collect enough evidence to prove your case at the stage of filing the complaint. The complaint must show that offence of cruelty has been committed by the accused and it is triable by the Magistrate. The complaint must prima facie proves the commission of the offence and supported by cogent evidence.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.