Deemed conveyance by builder or promoter after thirty seven years 

Deemed conveyance by builder or promoter after thirty seven years is possible or not. Hi, I live in a housing society which has not got its conveyance in 37 years. The promoters are very much around. In fact one of them stays in our housing society. The builder has passed away. In 2014 our chawl restarted the process of conveyance after we failed miserably in 2008 under the amnesty scheme. What bothers me is that we have opted to go for deemed conveyance even without completely exhausting the possibility of getting the conveyance from the promoter directly.  No official letter…

Deemed conveyance by builder or promoter after thirty seven years is possible or not. Hi, I live in a housing society which has not got its conveyance in 37 years. The promoters are very much around. In fact one of them stays in our housing society. The builder has passed away. In 2014 our chawl restarted the process of conveyance after we failed miserably in 2008 under the amnesty scheme. What bothers me is that we have opted to go for deemed conveyance even without completely exhausting the possibility of getting the conveyance from the promoter directly. 

No official letter sent by the managing committee & no legal notice served. Which is one of the most important documents for the deemed conveyance. I suspect some of the committee members are in cahoots with the promoters who harbour the ambition of redeveloping our project. I have singularly been voicing to serve a legal notice on the promoters.  Please advise the best step forward as the AGM comes up in a week's time? Thanks in advance

The flat takers have been residing here for thirty seven years. Builder never wanted to construct any more flats because he never applied to the concerned authority for granting additional floor space index (FSI). Therefore, it is a fit case for deemed conveyance. 

Deemed conveyance

For deemed conveyance the terms and condition of the agreement duly executed between the builder/promoter and flat buyers shall still applicable. You (flat buyers) cannot ignore the conditions to which agreements for sale were executed. In Tushar Jivram Chauhan v. State of Maharashtra, 2015 SCC OnLine Bom 3865 the Bombay High Court has held that the entitlement of deemed conveyance, even if any, cannot be beyond the agreement between the parties.

It is settled that one cannot transfer any movable and immovable property unless he possesses the right to do so in accordance with law. There are various facets and/or aspects of transfer of property movable and/or immovable. 

If, according to the prevailing terms and conditions of the agreement for sale, builder/promoter and his legal heirs still have the power to execute deed of conveyance in the favour of flat buyers, then you can approach the concerned authority under the MOFA Act, to compel the builder’s legal heir to execute conveyance deed.     

The Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Rules, 1964, Rule. 13 deals with deemed conveyance. Thus, deemed conveyance is still possible by builder or promoter even after thirty seven years of transferring possession to the flat buyers. 

In this situation you should apply to the appropriate authority constituted under the MOFA Act, to issue a deemed conveyance certificate to the flat buyers. 

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Lessor has refused to renew the lease even after receiving entire rent

A business owner in Gujarat faces a legal notice to vacate after their landlord refused to renew a lease, despite accepting rent in advance. Legal experts clarify that payment does not constitute an automatic renewal when written permission is required. While the lease terminates by efflux of time, the tenant may negotiate for sufficient relocation time.

My neighbor has constructed a 6 to 7-foot compound wall

This legal guidance explains the remedies available where a neighbour has raised a high compound wall obstructing light, air, access, or causing nuisance to adjoining property owners. It discusses municipal complaints, civil injunction suits, easement rights, and legal action that may be initiated against unauthorized construction.

My neighbor is constructing a house adjoining to my compound wall

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a neighbour constructs a building adjoining the compound wall without maintaining the required setback. It discusses municipal complaints, easement rights relating to light and air, temporary injunctions, and civil remedies available to prevent unauthorized or nuisance-causing construction.

Suit dismissed for defect in parties

This legal guidance explains the consequences of dismissal of a civil suit due to non-joinder or misjoinder of necessary parties. It discusses the remedy of impleading proper parties, restoration or refiling of the suit, amendment of pleadings, and the legal principles governing defect in parties under the Civil Procedure Code.