Departmental inquiry is initiated after six years of retirement

Departmental inquiry is initiated after six years of retirement. I retired in 2015 from the post of junior engineer in the irrigation department of Uttar Pradesh. At the time of retirement neither departmental nor judicial inquiry was pending. Therefore I got entire retirement benefits. After six years from the date of retirement a show cause […]

Departmental inquiry is initiated after six years of retirement. I retired in 2015 from the post of junior engineer in the irrigation department of Uttar Pradesh. At the time of retirement neither departmental nor judicial inquiry was pending. Therefore I got entire retirement benefits. After six years from the date of retirement a show cause notice had been issued to seek clarification about the excess payment regarding the construction of the check dam. I replied with a show cause notice but the department rejected my reply and held me guilty for excess payment to the contractor and initiated departmental inquiry about recovery of sixty lakh rupees from my retiral benefits. Now I am facing a false departmental inquiry without my fault. Please help.

Asked from: Uttar Pradesh

According to the Regulation 351A of the Civil Services Regulation (CSR) the department i.e. State Government cannot initiate departmental inquiry after four years of retirement. Therefore, the departmental inquiry which is initiated after six years of retirement is violative of Regulation 351A.

Regulation 351A of CSR protects the pensioners from malicious action of the state. 351A makes it mandatory for the government to take a sanction from the Governor before initiating departmental inquiry against the pensioner and the departmental inquiry shall be in respect of an event which took place not more than four years before the institution of such proceeding. The relevant part of Regulation 351-A of Civil Service Regulations is extracted below:- 

The Governor reserves to himself the right of withholding or withdrawing a pension or any part of it, whether permanently or for a specified period and the right of ordering the recovery from a pension of the whole or part of any pecuniary loss caused Government, if the pensioner is found in departmental or Judicial proceedings to have been guilty of grave misconduct, or to have caused pecuniary loss to Government by misconduct or negligence, during his service, including service rendered on reemployment after retirement :

Provided that- (a) such departmental proceedings, if not instituted while the office was on duty either before retirement or during re-employment- shall not be instituted save with the sanction of the Governor.

Such departmental proceedings shall be in respect of an event which took place not more than four years before the institution of such proceeding.

You retired in 2015 and departmental inquiry is initiated in 2021. Therefore, it is an undisputed fact that the incident in respect of which the departmental inquiry has been initiated took place much more than four years before the initiation of departmental inquiry.

In this situation the Governor cannot give sanction because the proviso of Regulation 351A specifically bars to grant sanction after four years of retirement. If the Governor has given sanction for prosecution/departmental inquiry, then such a sanction is illegal and void.

You should immediately file a writ petition in the High Court under Article 226 of the constitution of India for quashing of the departmental inquiry. The court shall not hesitate to quash this inquiry because it is initiated in violation of Regulations 351A of CSR.

Also read: Quashing of departmental proceedings

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Terminated from service for mere misconduct

This legal guidance explains the remedies available to an employee terminated from service for alleged misconduct without proper inquiry or proportional punishment. It discusses principles of natural justice, departmental proceedings, wrongful termination, reinstatement, back wages, and the legal remedies available before labour courts, tribunals, or constitutional courts.

Salary during termination period is illegally stopped by the department

This article discusses the legality of withholding salary during the period of termination or suspension from service. It examines the rights of an employee to claim salary, subsistence allowance, and other consequential benefits where the departmental action is alleged to be arbitrary, illegal, or contrary to service rules and principles of natural justice.

Daily wager service is terminated on misbehavior

This article discusses the legal implications of termination of service of a daily wager on allegations of misconduct or misbehavior. It examines whether principles of natural justice, departmental inquiry, and opportunity of hearing are required before terminating the services of a temporary or daily wage employee, along with the remedies available under labour and service laws.

Terminated from service by following illegal proceedings

This article examines the legality of termination orders passed after defective or unlawful departmental proceedings. It discusses violations of principles of natural justice, procedural irregularities in disciplinary inquiries, denial of reasonable opportunity of hearing, and the remedies available to an employee against illegal termination from service.