Daily wager service is terminated on misbehavior

This article discusses the legal implications of termination of service of a daily wager on allegations of misconduct or misbehavior. It examines whether principles of natural justice, departmental inquiry, and opportunity of hearing are required before terminating the services of a temporary or daily wage employee, along with the remedies available under labour and service laws.

Daily wager service is terminated on misbehavior with the senior officer. When I was deputed in the night duty one of the officers came and enquired about the HDR. I handed over the report of HDR which was not signed by the Rt technician. On this ground he abused me and insulted me in front of other staff. On the very next day he served me a copy of the termination order. The reason for termination is unsatisfactory service and misbehave with the senior doctor. Without any enquiry and recording of statements of staff presented on that day the termination order is passed. I am a daily wage employee (doctor). Please suggest how to reinstate in service?  

Asked from: Uttar Pradesh

The termination of a daily wage worker's service on the grounds of misbehavior does not carry a stigma. Similarly, if a daily wage worker is terminated due to unsatisfactory service, such termination is also not considered stigmatic. 

In the case of Dipti Prakash Banerjee v. Satyendra Nath Bose [1999 (81) FLR 687 (SC)], the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the use of terms such as “unsatisfactory work and conduct” in a termination order does not amount to a stigma.

The key distinction between termination simpliciter (a straightforward termination) and punitive termination is very thin and lies in their nature and implications. Termination simpliciter refers to ending employment without attributing fault or misconduct to the employee. In contrast, punitive termination arises from allegations of misconduct and involves a disciplinary proceeding.

The differentiation is subtle and must be determined based on the facts and circumstances of each case. Without reviewing the specifics of the termination order and the attending circumstances, it is not possible for me to definitively conclude whether the order is punitive or simpliciter.

  • Termination Simpliciter: When termination is simpliciter, no detailed inquiry or formal procedure is necessary.
  • Punitive Termination: In cases of punitive termination, the employer is required to conduct a proper inquiry and establish the guilt of the employee before issuing the termination order.

If the language in the termination order appears vague or non-punitive on the surface but is, in reality, punitive, the affected employee should approach the court. By filing a petition, the employee can pray for the quashing of the termination order and seek reinstatement. The court will evaluate the attending circumstances and the background of the case to decide whether the employee is suitable to continue in service.

Daily wage employment is fundamentally contingent on the requirements of the employing authority. A daily wage worker does not have any inherent legal right to hold a post or demand continued employment. Their engagement is typically temporary and subject to the needs of the employer. When daily wager service is terminated on misbehavior the court does not interfere in that order. 

If you can provide a copy of the termination order and details of the case's background, it would be possible to assess whether the termination was punitive or simpliciter. If the case involves wrongful termination, you may be advised to invoke Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the termination order.

Related:

 

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Terminated from service for mere misconduct

This legal guidance explains the remedies available to an employee terminated from service for alleged misconduct without proper inquiry or proportional punishment. It discusses principles of natural justice, departmental proceedings, wrongful termination, reinstatement, back wages, and the legal remedies available before labour courts, tribunals, or constitutional courts.

Salary during termination period is illegally stopped by the department

This article discusses the legality of withholding salary during the period of termination or suspension from service. It examines the rights of an employee to claim salary, subsistence allowance, and other consequential benefits where the departmental action is alleged to be arbitrary, illegal, or contrary to service rules and principles of natural justice.

Terminated from service by following illegal proceedings

This article examines the legality of termination orders passed after defective or unlawful departmental proceedings. It discusses violations of principles of natural justice, procedural irregularities in disciplinary inquiries, denial of reasonable opportunity of hearing, and the remedies available to an employee against illegal termination from service.

Promotion of ineligible candidate violating the principle of seniority cum merit

This article discusses the legality of granting promotion to an ineligible candidate in violation of the principle of seniority-cum-merit. It examines the rights of eligible employees, the scope of judicial review in service matters, and the circumstances in which a promotion order may be challenged before the High Court or service tribunal on the grounds of arbitrariness, discrimination, or breach of statutory service rules.