False case of criminal breach of trust under section 406 IPC

One of the partners of our firm has filed a false case under section 406/420 IPC. I, as a director of the firm taken some loan about 35 lakh @ 15% interest. Later on, my partner demanded to repay it out of the firm’s income. The dispute has arisen between us and finally, he filed a false case against me. This loan was taken for the business of the firm and brought it into the firm’s assets. What is a remedy for me against this false case?

One of the partners of our firm has filed a false case under section 406/420 IPC. I, as a director of the firm taken some loan about 35 lakh @ 15% interest. Later on, my partner demanded to repay it out of the firm’s income. The dispute has arisen between us and finally, he filed a false case against me.

This loan was taken for the business of the firm and brought it into the firm’s assets. What is a remedy for me against this false case?

You should file a petition before the High Court under section 482 Cr.P.C. because no offences of criminal breach of trust (Section 406 IPC) & Cheating (Section 420 IPC)are made out against you. It is a civil dispute hence, he cannot seek a remedy in the criminal proceeding.

He initiated the criminal proceeding with the intention of causing you unnecessary harassment. You can file above-mentioned quashing petition if the investigation is pending and investigating officer is about to file charge sheet before the court.

If charge sheet has filed then you should file a discharge petition before the trial court. If material or evidence collected by investigating officer is insufficient or do not infer that alleged offence is committed then accused is discharged by the trial court.

For the offence of criminal breach of trust, the money or property must be entrusted in accused. If accused does misappropriate the said property he commits the offence of criminal breach of trust.

In your case it was purely a commercial transaction and money was borrowed on certain terms and condition and both lender and borrower were partners of the firm. G. Sagar Suri vs State of U.P. AIR 2000 SC; the commercial transaction does not come under the purview of entrusting, it is a breach of contract instead of breach of trust.

Section 420: Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person de­ceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.

No offence under section 420 is made out because at the time of contract there was no dishonest and fraudulent intention of accused to breach of contract.

It is purely a civil nature case but he initiated a criminal proceeding. He should have filed a civil suit for the proper remedy. A criminal case shall not be sustained in your case, therefore, the High Court may quash this criminal proceeding.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.