Father in law filed false case of dowry death

My marriage was solemnised in the year 2010 at Patna, Bihar. My father in law and his family known to us for a long time. He filed a false case of dowry death against all the member of our family. In the year 2014 December my wife met an accident and it was hospitalised for treatment. She received many minor injuries but she got well but after 23 days from the date of discharged from hospital he felt high fever and backache due to this ailment I again hospitalised her in a reputed hospital. Due to high fever and internal…

My marriage was solemnised in the year 2010 at Patna, Bihar. My father in law and his family known to us for a long time. He filed a false case of dowry death against all the member of our family. In the year 2014 December my wife met an accident and it was hospitalised for treatment. She received many minor injuries but she got well but after 23 days from the date of discharged from hospital he felt high fever and backache due to this ailment I again hospitalised her in a reputed hospital.

Due to high fever and internal bleeding, she died in hospital during treatment. I have all the records like doctor’s prescription, discharge slip, postmortem report etc. My father in law and his family members were also present in the funeral. They raised no issue regarding her death but they were very co-operative in all the funeral and other rites. But after 2 months of her death, they filed a false case of dowry death and cruelty under section 304 B, 498 A at Patna, XXXX Police station. The investigation is completed and the trial is yet to begin in a few months. I am innocent and have sufficient evidence to prove it, my advocate told that FIR may be quashed by the High court if any application is a file under section 482. Please help.

Your advocate is right, you should apply to the High court because there are many grounds to quash this false proceeding.

  • Patna court has no jurisdiction to try this case because no cause of action arises in its jurisdiction.
  • Cognizance of the case and investigation is illegal due to lack of jurisdiction.
  • Section 177, 178, 178 CRPC provides jurisdiction for trial of criminal cases.
  • In Y. Abraham Ajith vs Inspector of Police AIR 2004 SC held by the supreme court that court has no jurisdiction to try a case where no part of the offence is committed in its local jurisdiction.
  • The offence has been committed in Bangalore, the funeral is performed in Bangalore and there was no demand of dowry before her death.
  • However her death caused within 7 years of her marriage but she was not subjected to cruelty in connection with demand of dowry, soon before death.

You have sufficient grounds to quash this proceeding including FIR so go through the opinion of your advocate.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.