Fee for FIR: Do I have to pay any fee for lodging FIR?

Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 provides a procedure for lodging an FIR. There is no fee or charges for the FIR (first information report). The officer in charge of the police station shall record the information about a cognisable offence without any fee. Thereafter, he gives a copy of FIR to […]

Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 provides a procedure for lodging an FIR. There is no fee or charges for the FIR (first information report). The officer in charge of the police station shall record the information about a cognisable offence without any fee. Thereafter, he gives a copy of FIR to the informant at the free of cost.

It is the duty of every citizen to inform the officer in charge of nearest police station about the commission of cognisable offence. Section 39 of the code of criminal procedure casts such a duty upon every person. The government plays the role of prosecution in the criminal cases.

Police has the power to initiate investigation in cognisable offence without warrant and order of the Magistrate. Hence, free flow of information will enable the police to lodge an FIR quickly. Demand of money for FIR will frustrate the object of section 39 & 154 crpc.

No fee for FIR

Section 154 crpc therefore, does not require any fee or charge for the FIR. FIR sets the criminal law in motion. Therefore, early information of crime shall enable the police officer to start investigation at earliest. During the course of investigation, the police officer (investigating officer) proceeds to the place of occurrence, collects evidence and arrests the accused. Thus police can arrest the accused and collect vital evidence at early stage if he gets information on time.

Also read: What is the procedure for recording of FIR

If the police officer demands any fee or money for the recording of an FIR, the informant should send the substance of the information to the superintendent of police (SP) by a registered post. The SP upon receiving the information, either himself investigate the offence or depute a subordinate officer for investigation. So, the officer in charge of the police station is not the sole person authorised to register FIR. 

Any demand of fee or charge for FIR is amount to gratification and is an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Thus do not give money to the police officer for the recording of FIR. The police officer is bound to register FIR if information discloses cognisable offence. Thus he cannot demand money for lodging of FIR.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.