Friend filed criminal case of cheating : What I should do?

I am doing a business of terrace farming. My friend is a partner in my business. He does not help me but comes on each week to take his share in profit. Yesterday he filed a false criminal case of cheating in XXX police station. He has alleged in the FIR that I have invested his money in the share market and earned a lot from it. actually he wants more money and when I have refused to give then he has filed such FIR. Sir, please guide me what I should do?

I am doing a business of terrace farming. My friend is a partner in my business. He does not help me but comes on each week to take his share in profit. Yesterday he filed a false criminal case of cheating in XXX police station. He has alleged in the FIR that I have invested his money in the share market and earned a lot from it. actually he wants more money and when I have refused to give then he has filed such FIR. Sir, please guide me what I should do?

The facts of your case suggest that ingredients of cheating are missing. You both are running a business in a partnership firm. Your friend is continuously getting profit from the business of the firm. Thus there is no deception or inducement from your side. 

He cannot prove that you have induced or deceived to deliver money from him. Section 415 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) defines cheating. According to section 415 IPC these are the essential elements:

  • There should be deception of a person
  • Accused has dishonestly induced the person to deliver any property or valuable things in the course of such inducement. 

The above elements do not exist in your case. Therefore, the criminal proceeding will not be sustained. In the circumstances of your case the High Court will quash this first information report (FIR).

Court will quash the FIR on the ground of civil nature dispute

There is a partnership firm in which you and your friend are partners. If any dispute arises in the course of partnership firm or business of firm then it would be a civil dispute rather than criminal offence [Murari Lal Gupta v. Gopi Singh (2005) 13 SCC 699]

Your partner has abused the process and by manipulating the facts he has lodged an FIR against you. That FIR and criminal prosecution is an abuse of process of the court. Hence, you should approach the High Court for quashing the FIR and drop the criminal proceeding. 

The Supreme Court has laid down seven golden rules for quashing FIR and your case comes under one of them. No offence of cheating has been made out from the facts of your case. Therefore, you should move a petition before the High Court under Section 482 crpc. In In Alpic Finance Ltd. vs. P. Sadasivan & Anr. (2001) 3 SCC 513 the Supreme Court has quashed the FIR on the ground that the case is related to civil nature dispute.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.