Government acquiring land on adverse possession

I am the owner of the land of about 30 acres. My name is mentioned in all the revenue record since the past 50 years. Nashik municipality is trying to acquire my land for construction of shopping mall but does not want to initiate acquisition procedure. It claims my land to its property on the ground of adverse possession. It claims that the municipality has been in possession on the land from the last 10 years based on a road which was constructed along with my land by the municipality in the year 2004. I have filed a complaint in…

I am the owner of the land of about 30 acres. My name is mentioned in all the revenue record since the past 50 years. Nashik municipality is trying to acquire my land for construction of shopping mall but does not want to initiate acquisition procedure.

It claims my land to its property on the ground of adverse possession. It claims that the municipality has been in possession on the land from the last 10 years based on a road which was constructed along with my land by the municipality in the year 2004. I have filed a complaint in the office of the collector but he is also reluctant to do anything. Please suggest me any legal procedure to save my land.

According to article 300 A of Indian constitution right to property is a constitutional right and property cannot be taken by the government without following the due process of law. When all the revenue records show that you are the owner of the land then how can a municipality corporation claim your land based on adverse possession?

You must file a writ before the High Court under article 226 of Indian constitution. In Vinayak Vishnu Dhopavkar vs State of Maharashtra AIR 2013 Bombay High Court; it is held by the Bombay High Court that

it would not be proper on the part of the government body or any state authority to take possession of somebody’s land without following due process of law. Even a citizen has permitted his land being used by a government authority, the government authority should not take undue advantage thereof. Government authority must acquire his land after paying compensation under the Land Acquisition Act.

You may file a writ petition based on aforesaid case law because no compensation is given by the government and no procedure under the Land Acquisition Act is followed.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Lessor has refused to renew the lease even after receiving entire rent

A business owner in Gujarat faces a legal notice to vacate after their landlord refused to renew a lease, despite accepting rent in advance. Legal experts clarify that payment does not constitute an automatic renewal when written permission is required. While the lease terminates by efflux of time, the tenant may negotiate for sufficient relocation time.

My neighbor has constructed a 6 to 7-foot compound wall

This legal guidance explains the remedies available where a neighbour has raised a high compound wall obstructing light, air, access, or causing nuisance to adjoining property owners. It discusses municipal complaints, civil injunction suits, easement rights, and legal action that may be initiated against unauthorized construction.

My neighbor is constructing a house adjoining to my compound wall

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a neighbour constructs a building adjoining the compound wall without maintaining the required setback. It discusses municipal complaints, easement rights relating to light and air, temporary injunctions, and civil remedies available to prevent unauthorized or nuisance-causing construction.

Suit dismissed for defect in parties

This legal guidance explains the consequences of dismissal of a civil suit due to non-joinder or misjoinder of necessary parties. It discusses the remedy of impleading proper parties, restoration or refiling of the suit, amendment of pleadings, and the legal principles governing defect in parties under the Civil Procedure Code.