Government has acquired my land but has not been paying compensation for six years

Government has acquired my land but has not been paying compensation for six years. The government acquired my land in 2011 but did not pay compensation to the owner of the land. My father was the landowner but now he is dead. So I think about regaining my land from the government. How can I get my land which has been acquired but compensation is pending?

by Shivendra Pratap Singh | May 25, 2022 | Property Cases

Government has acquired my land but has not been paying compensation for six years. The government acquired my land in 2011 but did not pay compensation to the owner of the land. My father was the landowner but now he is dead. So I think about regaining my land from the government. How can I get my land which has been acquired but compensation is pending?

You cannot get back your land because the government has taken possession in the course of land acquisition proceeding. The proceeding of land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of Act 2013 because of non-payment of compensation. 

Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), in case of land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894), where an award under the said section 11 has been made five years or more prior to the commencement of this Act but the physical possession of the land has not been taken or the compensation has not been paid the said proceedings shall be deemed to have lapsed and the appropriate Government, if it so chooses, shall initiate the proceedings of such land acquisition afresh in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

Provided that where an award has been made and compensation in respect of a majority of land holdings has not been deposited in the account of the beneficiaries, then, all beneficiaries specified in the notification for acquisition under section 4 of the said Land Acquisition Act, shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

Section 24(2) Land Acquisition Act, 2013

In Indore Development Authority versus Manoharlal and others, (AIR 2020 SC 1496) the supreme court has held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse due to non-payment of compensation. 

The deemed lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act takes place where due to inaction of authorities for five years or more prior to commencement of the said Act 2013, the possession of land has not been taken or compensation has not been paid. 

In other words, in case possession has been taken but compensation has not been paid then there is no lapse. Similarly, if compensation has been paid but possession has not been taken then there is no lapse.

Deemed lapse takes place when neither compensation is paid not possession has been taken in the course of award for land acquisition.

Under the provisions of Section 24(1)(a) in case the award is not made as on 1-1-2014, the date of commencement of the 2013 Act, there is no lapse of proceedings. Compensation has to be determined under the provisions of the 2013 Act.

Hence, you cannot regain your land which is already transferred in the possession of the government. If payment of compensation is pending, it shall be decided by the Act 2013 and you will get compensation on the basis of current market value of land. 

Author's Profile

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Consult Online

Related Matters

Lessor has refused to renew the lease even after receiving entire rent

Jun 14, 2025 |

A business owner in Gujarat faces a legal notice to vacate after their landlord refused to renew a lease, despite accepting rent in advance. Legal experts clarify that payment does not constitute an automatic renewal when written permission is required. While the lease terminates by efflux of time, the tenant may negotiate for sufficient relocation time.

My neighbor has constructed a 6 to 7-foot compound wall

Mar 8, 2025 |

This legal guidance explains the remedies available where a neighbour has raised a high compound wall obstructing light, air, access, or causing nuisance to adjoining property owners. It discusses municipal complaints, civil injunction suits, easement rights, and legal action that may be initiated against unauthorized construction.

My neighbor is constructing a house adjoining to my compound wall

Feb 18, 2025 |

This legal guidance explains the remedies available when a neighbour constructs a building adjoining the compound wall without maintaining the required setback. It discusses municipal complaints, easement rights relating to light and air, temporary injunctions, and civil remedies available to prevent unauthorized or nuisance-causing construction.

Suit dismissed for defect in parties

Jan 19, 2025 |

This legal guidance explains the consequences of dismissal of a civil suit due to non-joinder or misjoinder of necessary parties. It discusses the remedy of impleading proper parties, restoration or refiling of the suit, amendment of pleadings, and the legal principles governing defect in parties under the Civil Procedure Code.