How to file a complaint under section 200 crpc?

A person aggrieved of an offence can move a complaint to the Magistrate under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the AIIMS Employees’ Union vs Union of India (1996) 11 SCC 582 the Supreme Court has held that:  If the officer in charge of the police station has refused to lodge the FIR the aggrieved person […]

A person aggrieved of an offence can move a complaint to the Magistrate under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the AIIMS Employees’ Union vs Union of India (1996) 11 SCC 582 the Supreme Court has held that: 

If the officer in charge of the police station has refused to lodge the FIR the aggrieved person can file a petition of complaint under section 200 crpc. 

How to file a complaint under Section 200 crpc

Prepare a petition of complaint. State the incident in details which suggest that an offence has been committed. Adduce evidence along with the petition of complaint. Also produce witnesses who have knowledge or information about the commission of alleged offence. 

The complainant must sign the complaint and do proper verification of the facts stated in the complaint. The verification will prima facie infer that the complaint is genuine. 

When the Magistrate prima facie satisfies that offence has been committed, he shall examine the witness and proceed further. If the complaint does not infer the commission of offence, the accused can approach the High Court under Section 482 crpc for quashing of such a frivolous complaint. The Magistrate has many options open to him after receiving a complaint.

  • He can take cognisance and issue a warrant or summons against the accused under Section 204 crpc.
  • He can either inquire the case himself or direct the police officer to conduct an investigation under Section 202 crpc for the purpose to find out sufficient grounds for proceeding.
  • The Magistrate can dismiss the complaint if he finds no sufficient grounds for proceeding. 
  • Instead of taking cognisance the Magistrate may order investigation under Section 156(3) crpc.

If there is delay in filing a complaint the complainant must satisfy the reason for such a delay. The Magistrate cannot refuse the complaint only on the ground of delay. He has to examine the facts of the case and reasons for causing delay.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.