How to settle a dispute regarding withdrawn money from a friend’s bank account?

A person had withdrawn a good amount of money from his friend's bank account. His friend filed an FIR and he went to jail for 1 week and then released on bail. Currently he is on bail since 2019. How to settle a dispute regarding withdrawn money from a friend's bank account? I was handling his bank account and transferring money to the transporters. We are not partners in his firm. I am an employee but being a friend I had some extra power in handling bank account. 

by Shivendra Pratap Singh | Apr 27, 2022 | Criminal Law

How to settle a dispute regarding withdrawn money from a friend's bank account? A person had withdrawn a good amount of money from his friend's bank account. His friend filed an FIR and he went to jail for 1 week and then released on bail. Currently he is on bail since 2019. How to settle a dispute regarding withdrawn money from a friend's bank account? I was handling his bank account and transferring money to the transporters. We are not partners in his firm. I am an employee but being a friend I had some extra power in handling bank account. 

You have committed an offence i.e. criminal breach of trust. This is punishable under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Section 406 is a compoundable offence. 

If the informant/complainant is ready to settle the issue then the court can compound this case under Section 320 of the code of criminal procedure (crpc). 

Composition can take place at any stage of proceeding. You can apply for composition of case at the advance stage of trial or at the beginning of trial. But in all situations consent of court is mandatory for the composition. 

After composition the court will acquit the accused thereafter he shall not be again prosecuted for the same offence. Therefore, you should file an application for compounding of offence alongwith the agreement. 

If you have not prepared a settlement agreement you can file a unilateral petition in the court for compounding. The court will admit your petition and compound this case, 

Advocate's Profile

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Consult Online

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

Jul 3, 2026 | ,

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Apr 9, 2026 |

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Mar 5, 2026 |

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

Mar 2, 2026 |

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

Aug 10, 2025 |

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.