Husband has filed a divorce case against me but he is the real culprit

My husband has filed a divorce case against me, but he is the real culprit behind the filing of that civil suit for the divorce. I went to my parental house when my father got injured in a road accident. Soon after I returned back to my matrimonial home but when my father's health deteriorated and once again, he admitted to the hospital, I went to my paternal home for taking care of my father because I am the only child. My son was also live with me, my husband thereafter not willing to live with me. he does not…

My husband has filed a divorce case against me, but he is the real culprit behind the filing of that civil suit for the divorce. I went to my parental house when my father got injured in a road accident. Soon after I returned back to my matrimonial home but when my father's health deteriorated and once again, he admitted to the hospital, I went to my paternal home for taking care of my father because I am the only child. My son was also live with me, my husband thereafter not willing to live with me. he does not want to take me back and created hindrance since past three years. After three years, he filed a civil suit for the divorce. 

Your husband has no right to seek divorce on the ground of desertion if he has deliberately obstructed you to return to your matrimonial home. The facts of your case are suggesting that your husband does not want to live with you, he wants to achieve his goal in the pretext of your compulsion to take care of your father.

In Smt. Tejendra Kaur v. Jogendra Singh reported in 2000 (4) AWC 3137 the Allahabad High Court has opined that if the wife is prepared to live with the husband and if husband is not ready to take her back and if there is no material evidence to support acquisition about the wife treating the husband with cruelty, decree for divorce granted by the Family Court, is to be set aside.

Your husband has no evidence to prove that you have deserted him. In this situation you should collect evidence to prove that whenever you desired to come back your husband either refused or created hinderances. This will assist the court to form an opinion that wife is willing to perform her matrimonial duties, but husband has not allowed her to do so.

In Rishikesh Sharma v. Saroj Sharma reported in 2007 (1) AWC 760(SC), in the case of Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh reported in 2007 (5) AWC 4820(SC) the Supreme Court has held that marriage in our Hindu society is said to be sacrosanct and is treated with sense of social security specially to the women. For this reason, Apex Court, gave emphasis that stress should always be on preserving the institution of marriage.

You should contest the divorce case and produce evidence which tend to prove the guilt of your husband in living apart for three years.

Tags: Divorce

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या तलाक के लिये पति-पत्नी को अलग-अलग रहना जरूरी है

हिन्दू विवाह अधिनियम की धारा 13बी के तहत आपसी सहमति से तलाक के लिए एक वर्ष का पृथक्करण आवश्यक है। कानूनन अलग रहने का अर्थ केवल अलग निवास नहीं, बल्कि वैवाहिक संबंधों का पूर्णतः खत्म होना है। यदि एक ही छत के नीचे रहते हुए भी दाम्पत्य जीवन समाप्त हो चुका है, तो आपसी सहमति से तलाक का वाद दाखिल किया जा सकता है।

Wife calling me impotent in front of the family members

This article explains the legal remedies available when a wife repeatedly humiliates her husband by calling him impotent before family members. It discusses how such allegations, particularly when false or defamatory, may amount to mental cruelty under matrimonial law and can constitute valid grounds for divorce and other legal action.

Uncompromising conduct of wife is cruelty against husband

This legal guidance explains that persistent refusal by a wife to adjust with the husband’s family, compelling him to live separately, and maintaining an uncompromising attitude may amount to mental cruelty under matrimonial law. Such conduct can constitute a valid ground for seeking divorce before the competent Family Court.

Husband file divorce case on the ground of mental cruelty abusing and beating

This legal guidance explains that repeated abusive behaviour, physical assault, humiliation, and false allegations by a spouse may constitute mental cruelty under matrimonial law. A husband facing such conduct can seek divorce before the Family Court by proving continuous cruelty, harassment, and breakdown of matrimonial relations.

Childless old lady can seek maintenance

This legal guidance explains that a childless elderly woman who is unable to maintain herself may claim maintenance from relatives legally bound to support her. It discusses remedies under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, personal laws, and the legal rights available to senior citizens for financial support and protection.