Husband obstructing petition by taking unreasonable adjournments

Respected sir, my husband was taken lots of unreasonable adjournments to delay the judgment in my maintenance petition. I have filed a petition in the year 2000 and got judgment in September 2015. The court in the judge gave the order of maintenance from the date of order instead of from the date of filing of the petition. No interim maintenance had been received and no other relief was sought by me. I want to appeal this judgment for giving maintenance from the date filing of my petition. Can you advise me the correct proposition of law?

Respected sir, my husband was taken lots of unreasonable adjournments to delay the judgment in my maintenance petition. I have filed a petition in the year 2000 and got judgment in September 2015.

The court in the judge gave the order of maintenance from the date of order instead of from the date of filing of the petition. No interim maintenance had been received and no other relief was sought by me. I want to appeal this judgment for giving maintenance from the date filing of my petition. Can you advise me the correct proposition of law?

Section 125 of the code of criminal procedure [crpc] provides a swift remedy to get maintenance from the husband. In many cases husband refuses to give maintenance and take unnecessary adjournment on the filing of the application. Unfortunately, your case continued for 15 years before the court to decide. It is a rule that maintenance would be awarded from the date of order [K. Shivaram vs Mangalamba (1990) Cri LJ].

But the court has the power to grant maintenance from the date of filing of the application by recording special reasons [section 354(6) CRPC] Shail Kumari Devi vs Krishna Bhagwan Pathak [2008] 9 SCC. You should have pleaded for granting of maintenance from the date of filing of the application. Without pleading this fact court is not bound to grant maintenance from the date of filing of the application.

However in exceptional cases when the court found that husband deliberately causing delay court can pass such order. In Shail Kumari Devi vs Krishna Bhagwan Pathak [2008] 9 SCC Supreme court has held that in conducive of justice in the case court may order to grant maintenance from the date of application if husband obstructing petition by taking unreasonable adjournments in the case. This is reiterated in the case of Krishna Jain 1992 Cri. LJ.

You should file an appeal in the high court based on aforesaid judgment for granting maintenance from the date of filing of the application.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या तलाक के लिये पति-पत्नी को अलग-अलग रहना जरूरी है

हिन्दू विवाह अधिनियम की धारा 13बी के तहत आपसी सहमति से तलाक के लिए एक वर्ष का पृथक्करण आवश्यक है। कानूनन अलग रहने का अर्थ केवल अलग निवास नहीं, बल्कि वैवाहिक संबंधों का पूर्णतः खत्म होना है। यदि एक ही छत के नीचे रहते हुए भी दाम्पत्य जीवन समाप्त हो चुका है, तो आपसी सहमति से तलाक का वाद दाखिल किया जा सकता है।

Wife calling me impotent in front of the family members

This article explains the legal remedies available when a wife repeatedly humiliates her husband by calling him impotent before family members. It discusses how such allegations, particularly when false or defamatory, may amount to mental cruelty under matrimonial law and can constitute valid grounds for divorce and other legal action.

Uncompromising conduct of wife is cruelty against husband

This legal guidance explains that persistent refusal by a wife to adjust with the husband’s family, compelling him to live separately, and maintaining an uncompromising attitude may amount to mental cruelty under matrimonial law. Such conduct can constitute a valid ground for seeking divorce before the competent Family Court.

Husband file divorce case on the ground of mental cruelty abusing and beating

This legal guidance explains that repeated abusive behaviour, physical assault, humiliation, and false allegations by a spouse may constitute mental cruelty under matrimonial law. A husband facing such conduct can seek divorce before the Family Court by proving continuous cruelty, harassment, and breakdown of matrimonial relations.

Childless old lady can seek maintenance

This legal guidance explains that a childless elderly woman who is unable to maintain herself may claim maintenance from relatives legally bound to support her. It discusses remedies under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, personal laws, and the legal rights available to senior citizens for financial support and protection.