Husband obstructing petition by taking unreasonable adjournments
Question From: Family Law
Respected sir, my husband was taken lots of unreasonable adjournments with a view to delay the judgment in my maintenance petition. I have filed petition in year 2000 and got judgment in September 2015.
Court in the judgment gave order of maintenance from the date of order instead of from the date of filing of petition. No interim maintenance had been received and no other relief was sought by me. I want to appeal this judgment for giving maintenance from the date filing of my petition. Can you advice me the correct proposition of law.
Section 125 of the code of criminal procedure [crpc] provides swift remedy to get maintenance from husband. In many cases husband refuses to give maintenance and take unnecessary adjournment on filing of application. It is unfortunate that your case continued for 15 years before the court to decide. It is a rule that maintenance would be awarded from the date of order [K. Shivaram vs Mangalamba (1990) Cri LJ].
But court has power to grant maintenance from the date of filing of application by recording special reasons [section 354(6) CRPC] Shail Kumari Devi vs Krishna Bhagwan pathak  9 SCC. You should have plead for granting of maintenance from the date of filing of application. Without pleading this fact court is not bound to grant maintenance from the date of filing of application.
However in exceptional cases when court found that husband deliberately causing delay court can pass such order. In Shail Kumari Devi vs Krishna Bhagwan pathak  9 SCC Supreme court has held that in conducive of justice in the case court may order to grant maintenance from the date of application if husband obstructing petition by taking unreasonable adjournments in the case. This is reiterated in the case of Krishna Jain 1992 Cri. LJ.
You should file appeal in the high court on the basis of aforesaid judgment for granting maintenance from the date of filing of application.
Image courtesy : google.com
Ask A Question
You can ask your question to Mr Shivendra Pratap Singh, (Advocate, High Court Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)
Talk to Advocate
Talk to advocate on phone for 30 minutes and get solid legal advice
Succession Certificate: Section 372 [The Indian Succession Act, 1925] 372 Application for certificate. — (1) Application for such a certificate shall be made to the District Judge by a petition signed and verified by or on behalf of the applicant in the manner...
Sub-section 4 of Section 125 crpc enumerates that if a wife without any reasonable cause refuses to live with her husband, she is not entitled to maintenance. The court before granting an order of maintenance must examine the fact of refusal to live with the husband.
The land revenue record shows the land as inalienable when the tenure holder or owner of the land has no right to transfer the land. Generally, government land or patta land is made inalienable because actual right vested in the government. The tenure holder has the right to cultivate the land and enjoy the usufruct.
Section 154 CrPC does not mandate that only victim can lodge the FIR. Any person can register the FIR if he knows that a cognisable offence has been committed. In Prakash Singh vs State of Punjab, the Supreme Court held that police officer could not make an inquiry about genuineness of FIR.
Get A Quick Advice
Book an appointment for 15 minutes and consult with an expert over the phone within minutes
Join Our Newsletter
Subscribe our newsletter to get our news as well as important legal updates of Supreme Court & High Courts