Investigating officer has converted the charge of attempt to murder into grievous hurt

I have received three bullet injuries on my right shoulder, chest and collarbone. There is a medical report of those injuries but the investigating officer has converted the charge of attempt to murder into grevious hurt. He did so under political pressure. I have some eyewitnesses who are ready to record their statements. What should I do against the illegal act of investigating officer?

I have received three bullet injuries on my right shoulder, chest and collarbone. There is a medical report of those injuries but the investigating officer has converted the charge of attempt to murder into grevious hurt. He did so under political pressure. I have some eyewitnesses who are ready to record their statements. What should I do against the illegal act of investigating officer?

The investigating officer has no power to convert the charge of attempt to murder into grevious hurt if the victim has a medical evidence of injuries. This is a grave misconduct on the part of the investigating officer. He cannot ignore or refuse the medical report. Instead, he should collect the medical examination report and attach it to the case diary.

I think you still have the marks of bullet injuries on the particular parts of your body. Investigating officer cannot ignore or suppress this evidence. If he did so, you should take immediate action against him.

What to do when investigating officer has converted the charge

It is the duty of the investigating officer to collect all the evidence relating to the crime. He cannot ignore or overlook vital evidence such as the injuries sustained by the victim. You have received all the injuries on the vital parts of the body which can cause your death. Attempt to murder is an offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge, and under such circumstances that, if he by that act caused death, he would be guilty of murder, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine……………

Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code

The accused had the intention to cause your death. His intention is reflecting from the injuries he has caused on your body. Chest, shoulder, and collarbone are vital parts of the body. Firing of bullets on these parts is capable of causing death in the natural course. Therefore, it is a fit case of attempt to murder. 

File an application under section 156(3) crpc

First of all you should file an application to the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the code of criminal procedure. You should demand from the court to call a status report of investigation from the investigating officer. The investigating officer will submit the case diary in the court. 

The Magistrate will examine the case diary. If the Investigating officer has converted the charge, which is originally alleged in FIR, the case diary will not have:

  • Medical report, 
  • Medical examination of victim, 
  • Recovery of blood stained earth from the place of occurrence,
  • Statements of eye witnesses etc.

If the Magistrate, upon perusal of the case diary, finds that the investigating officer has changed the line of investigation he can monitor the investigation. He can direct the investigating officer to collect that evidence and do the investigation on the line of attempt to murder.

Defective investigation

This is an example of improper and defective investigation. It violates the fundamental right of the victim. Victim is entitled to get a fair investigation from the state agency i.e. police officer.

Defective investigation tends to shake the faith reposed by the members of the society including the suspect/accused as well as Victim. The most effected would be suspect because all have to be presumed to be innocent till proved guilty and tainted investigation would curtail his freedoms i.e. life and liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab (2009) 1 SCC 441

The supreme court has held that the victim can approach the Magistrate under Section 156(3) crpc if the investigating officer is doing proper investigation. 

27. As we have already observed above, the Magistrate has very wide powers to direct registration of an FIR and to ensure a proper investigation, and for this purpose he can monitor the investigation to ensure that the investigation is done properly (though he cannot investigate himself). The High Court should discourage the practice of filing a writ petition or petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. simply because a person has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered by the police, or after being registered, proper investigation has not been done by the police. For this grievance, the remedy lies under Sections 36 and 154(3) before the concerned police officers, and if that is of no avail, under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. before the Magistrate or by filing a criminal complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and not by filing a writ petition or a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Sakri Vasu v. State of UP, (2008) 2 SCC 409

Remedy against improper investigation

The above judgments of the Supreme Court held that you have a fundamental right to get fair investigation. If the investigating officer has manipulated the investigation, then you can approach the Magistrate under Section 156(3) crpc. 

The Magistrate, however, has the power to monitor the investigation and ensure that the investigating officer does not frustrate the purpose of investigation. An attempt to convert the attempt to murder into grevious hurt will frustrate the very purpose of investigation. 

If investigating officer has converted the charge of attempt to murder into grevious hurt through the manipulation of evidence, it is your right to approach the Magistrate. You cannot directly approach the High Court under Section 482 crpc or under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

You should file an application under Section 156(3) crpc as soon as possible. If the Magistrate does not take proper action then you can approach the High Court and file a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.