Investigation is conducted by police inspector in prevention of corruption act

As a doctor assigned to the XX Primary Health Centre in Bahraich district of Uttar Pradesh, I was apprehended by a vigilance team during a trap operation. Although no evidence was found on my person, the team had no formal authorization to conduct the procedure. It appears that the police inspector who orchestrated the trap had a personal vendetta against me. Fortunately, I was granted bail by the special court. Now, I am seeking advice on how to challenge the charge sheet that the police officer has submitted after completing the investigation.

Investigation is conducted by police inspector in prevention of corruption act. As a doctor assigned to the XX Primary Health Centre in Bahraich district of Uttar Pradesh, I was apprehended by a vigilance team during a trap operation. Although no evidence was found on my person, the team had no formal authorization to conduct the procedure. It appears that the police inspector who orchestrated the trap had a personal vendetta against me. Fortunately, I was granted bail by the special court. Now, I am seeking advice on how to challenge the charge sheet that the police officer has submitted after completing the investigation.

You should file a petition before the High Court Lucknow under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure for quashing of the charge sheet because police inspector has not power to investigate a crime registered under the prevention of corruption act unless he is authorised by a competent authority.

According to the law, only police officers ranked above the level of Deputy Superintendent of Police are authorized to investigate trap cases unless authorized by the government. If you have been summoned by the trial court to appear in the framing of charges, you have the opportunity to object to the chargesheet. You may raise concerns about the investigating officer's incapacity to conduct the investigation and request a reinvestigation.

You can avail this opportunity before filing an application in the high court under section 482 crpc. In H.N. Rishbud v. State of Delhi AIR 1955 SC 196 the supreme court has expressed its view that a Special Judge under the Act of 1988 has certain powers of a Magistrate and therefore, he can even order re-investigation of the case and the irregularity in the investigation, if any can be corrected.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.