Mother in law is demanding money and filed a criminal case against the daughter in law

My mother in law is demanding money and filed a criminal case against me (daughter in law). My husband passed away two years ago. After a few days, my mother in law filed a case. The case was filed that we did not take care of my mother-in-law. So we agreed to give 4 lakhs as the witness of big men saying that her daughter will take care of her in the panchayat. We have agreed that we will give two lakhs now and give another two lakhs after our son gets a job. Getting the job will be a…

My mother in law is demanding money and filed a criminal case against me (daughter in law). My husband passed away two years ago. After a few days, my mother in law filed a case. The case was filed that we did not take care of my mother-in-law. So we agreed to give 4 lakhs as the witness of big men saying that her daughter will take care of her in the panchayat. We have agreed that we will give two lakhs now and give another two lakhs after our son gets a job. Getting the job will be a bit late but they are filing a case in the police station and demanding the remaining two lakhs, what should I do now? What case should I keep on them?

You have no source of income. Your son is also dependent upon you for his basic and essential needs. In this situation the demand of money from you (a destitute lady) is illegal. 

In the prevailing circumstances a mother in law has no right to claim money from her destitute daughter in law. The criminal case, initiated by your mother in law, is fit for the quashing under Section 482 of the code of criminal procedure. 

Before moving to High Court for quashing of the criminal case, you should move an application before the Family Dispute Redressal Centre, situated at the mediation centre of the family court for the settlement of the dispute. 

Instead, you can also approach the SHO of Mahila Thana of your district for referring this matter to the mediation. If the mediator successfully reconciles the dispute the criminal case shall be closed.

If the mediation fails, then you should approach the High Court for quashing the case. You should take a plea that the accused (daughter in law) has no source of income and is also living in vagrancy, therefore, it is impossible to pay 2 lakh rupees to the complainant. The court, after satisfaction of the fact that the accused is innocent, may quash the criminal proceeding. 

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.