Mutually agreed Divorce

My daughter & Son-in-Law are not finding compatible with each other for the last few years and are on the verge of breaking. They are married strictly as per the customary practice of Lingayat community (Fully discussed in the Supreme Court decision referred below) duly performed by a community priest. My advocate advised that the […]

My daughter & Son-in-Law are not finding compatible with each other for the last few years and are on the verge of breaking. They are married strictly as per the customary practice of Lingayat community (Fully discussed in the Supreme Court decision referred below) duly performed by a community priest.

My advocate advised that the Supreme Court in a recent decision rendered in the case of Shakunthala Bai and another Vs. L.V. Kulkarni and another reported in AIR 1989 S.C. Page 1359 has upheld the customary divorce prevailing in Panchamasali Sub-sect of Lingayat community, hence they can take divorce, or dissolve their marriage as per their custom without recourse to the Court of Law.

Asked from: Karnataka

It is well established by a catena of judgments of the supreme court and many High courts that customary divorce is legally valid if the prevalence of such customary divorce, in the community to which parties belong, is fully established [Subramani And Ors vs M. Chandralekha AIR 2005 SC].

The customary divorce takes its validity from section 29(2) of Hindu Marriage Act as “Nothing contained in this Act shall be deemed to affect any right recognized by custom or conferred by any special enactment to obtain the dissolution of a Hindu Marriage, whether solemnized before or after the commencement of this Act.”

Yamanaji H. Jadhav v. Nirmala, [2002] 2 SCC 637; Supreme Court held that “Public policy, good morals and the interests of society were considered to require and ensure that, if at all, severance should be allowed only in the manner and for the reason or cause specified in law, with only exception where it is recognized by custom.” If a custom prevails in the community which provides an alternate process of divorce which is not contrary to the law of the land is valid.

Shakuntalabai And Anr. vs L.V. Kulkarni And Anr AIR 1989 SC 1359; in this case, the issue was the validity of customary dissolution of marriage as per the custom of “Udiki form of marriage”. Supreme court upheld the custom of Udiki prevalent in Panchamasale sect of Lingayat community.

You may go with the custom and prepare a divorce deed. Such deed should be signed by the parties to the marriage in presence of two witnesses and thereupon get registration of the deed. Such deed is legally valid and acceptable in every court as evidence of dissolution of marriage. Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act also provides a remedy to dissolve marriage by the mutual consent of spouses.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या तलाक के लिये पति-पत्नी को अलग-अलग रहना जरूरी है

हिन्दू विवाह अधिनियम की धारा 13बी के तहत आपसी सहमति से तलाक के लिए एक वर्ष का पृथक्करण आवश्यक है। कानूनन अलग रहने का अर्थ केवल अलग निवास नहीं, बल्कि वैवाहिक संबंधों का पूर्णतः खत्म होना है। यदि एक ही छत के नीचे रहते हुए भी दाम्पत्य जीवन समाप्त हो चुका है, तो आपसी सहमति से तलाक का वाद दाखिल किया जा सकता है।

Wife calling me impotent in front of the family members

This article explains the legal remedies available when a wife repeatedly humiliates her husband by calling him impotent before family members. It discusses how such allegations, particularly when false or defamatory, may amount to mental cruelty under matrimonial law and can constitute valid grounds for divorce and other legal action.

Uncompromising conduct of wife is cruelty against husband

This legal guidance explains that persistent refusal by a wife to adjust with the husband’s family, compelling him to live separately, and maintaining an uncompromising attitude may amount to mental cruelty under matrimonial law. Such conduct can constitute a valid ground for seeking divorce before the competent Family Court.

Husband file divorce case on the ground of mental cruelty abusing and beating

This legal guidance explains that repeated abusive behaviour, physical assault, humiliation, and false allegations by a spouse may constitute mental cruelty under matrimonial law. A husband facing such conduct can seek divorce before the Family Court by proving continuous cruelty, harassment, and breakdown of matrimonial relations.

Childless old lady can seek maintenance

This legal guidance explains that a childless elderly woman who is unable to maintain herself may claim maintenance from relatives legally bound to support her. It discusses remedies under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, personal laws, and the legal rights available to senior citizens for financial support and protection.