My friend has taken loan on my name

My friend has taken a loan my name and he is threatening me to pay its EMI otherwise he told my details to the bank and initiate legal proceedings against me. I am astounded to hear this, I am an innocent person. He has used my name, pan detail, Aadhar number and my mobile number. That loan is sanctioned by a local company on the phone. All verifications have been done without my knowledge.

My friend has taken a loan my name and he is threatening me to pay its EMI otherwise he told my details to the bank and initiate legal proceedings against me. I am astounded to hear this, I am an innocent person. He has used my name, pan detail, Aadhar number and my mobile number. That loan is sanctioned by a local company on the phone. All verifications have been done without my knowledge. 

Your friend's actions are illegal and fraudulent. He has taken a loan in your name without your consent and has used your personal details to do so. This is identity theft, which is a serious crime.

You should immediately inform the local company that sanctioned the loan about the situation and let them know that you did not authorize the loan. You should also inform the bank that your friend has threatened you and is trying to coerce you into paying the loan. Make sure to provide them with any evidence you have, such as messages or emails from your friend.

You should also file a complaint with the police about your friend's actions. Provide them with all the evidence you have, including any messages or emails from your friend, as well as the loan documents and any other relevant information.

It is important to take action as soon as possible to protect yourself and prevent any further fraudulent activity from occurring.

Tags:

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

Husband is demanding DNA test to check the paternity of our son in divorce case

The law does not permit a husband to compel his wife or child to undergo a DNA test merely on the basis of suspicion. In Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal (1993) 3 SCC 418, the Supreme Court held that a blood or DNA test cannot be directed as a matter of course. Before seeking such a direction, the husband must establish a strong prima facie case by proving that he had no access to his wife during the period when the child could have been conceived.

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.