One of employee has committed suicide after receiving show cause notice

This article discusses the legal implications arising when an employee allegedly commits suicide after receiving a show-cause notice or disciplinary communication from the employer. It examines the circumstances in which criminal liability, including abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, may or may not arise against departmental authorities, and analyses the principles governing mens rea, workplace harassment, and disciplinary proceedings under Indian law.

One of employee has committed suicide after receiving show cause notice for his misconduct in handling and discharging his duty. On receiving a report from the joint director that the PO has not handling the case with due diligence therefore, lost the matter in the court. Thereafter, a fact-finding inquiry was set up and receiving that findings a show cause notice was served. When he committed suicide, an FIR has been lodged against me for the offence under Section 306/107 IPC. Please suggest what to do next.

 Asked from: Uttar Pradesh

Based on the facts of your case, it appears there was no instigation or incitement from your side to commit suicide. When the show cause notice was served, the deceased had the opportunity to explain the situation or present his stance against the allegation of misconduct. Until then, no adverse action was likely to be taken against him. 

There was no threat posed to him as a result of the show cause notice. In cases of alleged abetment of suicide, there must be proof of direct or indirect acts of incitement to the commission of suicide. There must be clear and convincing evidence of such acts. In the case of suicide, mere allegations of harassment by another person are insufficient unless the actions of the accused compelled the victim to commit suicide, and such actions must be closely connected to the time of the incident.

According to this legal position, there must be direct or indirect evidence showing that the accused, through a continuous course of conduct, created a situation where the deceased felt they had no option but to commit suicide. In your case, there is no evidence of any such continuous conduct by the accused.

Therefore, prima facie, there is no evidence to support the allegation of inducement or abetment of suicide. In the case of Ude Singh vs. State of Haryana AIR 2019 SC 4570, the Supreme Court held that:

If the accused plays an active role in damaging the victim's self-esteem and self-respect, which eventually drives the victim to commit suicide, the accused may be held guilty of abetment of suicide.

However, issuing a show cause notice following a preliminary inquiry does not in any way tarnish the self-esteem of the deceased. It is part of a departmental inquiry process when an allegation of misconduct or dereliction of duty has been made against an employee.

No punishment was imposed with the issuance of the show cause notice, nor did it have any adverse impact on the character roll of the deceased employee. Under these circumstances, no offence is made out against you.

It is advisable to file a petition in the High Court under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the FIR, as no offence is made out against the accused. The FIR may be quashed by the High Court. For more legal help please visit Kanoon India.

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.