I am Senior citizen aged 73 years Ex-serviceman was in active service during all the three wars. Suffering from high blood pressure. I purchased House flat No.6-3-790/3/1 and registered on my name on 5.12.2003 from xxx and let out for residential use. The person lived with family children and running kitchen. His wife used sewing machine, and embroidery.
They maintained that they were using the flat for residential. I have paid property tax up to 2015 but received several notices from GHMC. I have given several representations to the concerned authority but nothing have been done till date. Please advice what action should I take.
Have a look how the property tax is assessed by the Commissioner of the GHMC. According to the A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 (APM Act), where the Council by resolution determines that a property tax shall be levied, such tax shall be levied on all buildings and lands within Municipal limits at a percentage of their Annual Rental Value (ARV) or capital value of the land.
Section 85 of APM Act, 1965 prescribed that property tax shall be levied at such percentages of capital value of lands or buildings on such graded basis, as may be fixed by the Council in respect of buildings or lands used or occupied by the owner. Secondly, property tax shall be levied at such percentages of the Annual Rental Value of such buildings or lands let out on rent. Tax levied for the residential building, within the municipal area, @ 25 percent of Annual Rental Value.
The Annual Rental Value (ARV) of lands and buildings shall be deemed to be the gross annual rent at which they may reasonably be expected to let from month-to-month or year-to-year with reference to the following factors:
- Location of the building
- Type of construction
- Plinth area
- Age of the building
- Nature of usage to which it is put
According to your question all the notices of the GHMC are issued on arbitrary basis and no reasoned decision based upon reasoning have been given ever. According to the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 property tax cannot be fixed on the basis of photograph of the property. In each case on spot physical verification is necessary. Whenever a notice has been given to the assesse it must be reasoned and prepared in the format prescribed in Assessment of Property Tax Rules, 1990.
The Commissioner is bound by the AMP Act to duly fix the monthly rental value and records reasons for increase/decrease of Property Tax for each assessment. As soon as assessment is fixed by the Commissioner in the Assessment list, a special notice of property tax for assessment of property tax or amendment where there is enhancement in the tax shall be prepared in the format prescribed in Assessment of Property Tax Rules, 1990. Where there is enhancement of the tax, the owners of properties are entitled to file revision petitions within 30 days from the date of service of special notice.
As soon as a revision petition is received in municipal office from a tax payer against the property tax assessment fixed by the Commissioner, the revision petition shall be entered in a Register of Revision Petitions in Form E appended to Andhra Pradesh Municipalities (Assessment of Taxes) Rules, 1990.
The Commissioner shall give an opportunity to the petitioner to appear either in person or by an authorized agent. At the time of hearing, the Commissioner shall record the statement of the petitioner regarding the submissions made by him for reduction of property tax. After recording the statement of the petitioner by the Commissioner, signature of the petitioner shall be obtained on the statement.
After completing the hearing of the revision petition, the Commissioner shall pass a speaking order. In simple terms, a speaking order is an order that speaks for itself. The order should contain all the details of the case, pleadings of the petitioner, clear findings of the competent authority on the case and should appear as a reasoned order.
The above mentioned procedure for assessment of property tax has not been followed by the concerned authority in your case. Concerned authority has passed all the orders arbitrarily without giving reasons about enhancement of tax and penalty thereupon. This act of the authority constitutes cause of action to initiate legal recourse against that orders.
According to para 16 of your question, a Tax Inspector was visited your house and conducted physical verification. In order to that verification a revised bill was send to you. If you find this revised bill of tax Rs, 29698/ annum is legally assessed thus you can file a suit.
You should file a civil suit before the City Small causes Court, Hyderabad for fixing of property tax as per the law framed by the GHMC and compensation for mental agony, cost incurred in the litigation and rebate from late payment of tax.
In M/S. Big Apple Manufacturing Co. vs GHMC [State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 2012] Held by the State Forum that :-
“purpose of the tax is to raise funds for the support of the Government or for public purpose. The tax levied for the general purpose of the state provides various forms of facilities to citizens cannot be said to be consideration for any specific facility, benefit, or service provided by the state. There can be no nexus between the tax and service rendered by the municipality and on this ground assesses does not become a consumer. Thus matter has to be decided by the City Small causes Court and not by Consumer Forum.
Image courtesy : google.com
Ask A Question
You can ask your question to Mr Shivendra Pratap Singh, (Advocate, High Court Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)
To view this protected post, enter the password below:
Section 340 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195. (1) When, upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interests of justice that an inquiry should be...
Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation And Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) entitles the flat buyer to claim a refund of money and compensation for any loss from the builder. If the builder did not complete the project within time he shall be liable to refund the money with interest.
Section 154 CrPC: Information in cognizable cases (FIR) (1) Every information relating to the commission of a cognizable offence, if given orally to an officer in charge of a police station, shall be reduced to writing by him or under his direction, and be read Over...
Get A Quick Advice
Book an appointment for 15 minutes and consult with an expert over the phone within minutes
Join Our Newsletter
Subscribe our newsletter to get our news as well as important legal updates of Supreme Court & High Courts