Prosecution produced CCTV recording

This article discusses the evidentiary value of CCTV footage in criminal proceedings, particularly where the prosecution relies on electronic evidence to establish the accused’s presence at the scene of occurrence. It also examines the legal requirement of a certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act for admissibility of electronic records.

Prosecution produced CCTV recording to prove my presence in the apartment where the offence was committed. That CCTV recording was alleged to be taken from the apartment office. But as per my knowledge that recording was taken by prosecution from the mobile phone. No date is mentioned or otherwise appearing in that recording. Prosecution also did not mention from where he produced it. When the offence was committed, I was in Delhi. But I have no evidence to prove it. The offence was committed on 12-02-2019 and I was in Delhi between 23 January 2019 to 19 February. Please advise how to disprove prosecution evidence?

Asked from: Haryana

If the recording was not taken from CCTV, you can easily prove that the evidence is manipulated and false. You should raise an objection about its admissibility. When the evidence is produced by the party and the court is exhibiting that evidence then it is resistivity of the opponent to raise objection if that evidence is inadmissible.

The CCTV recording is a piece of electronic evidence. Therefore, the prosecution is bound to produce a certificate under section 65-B of the Indian evidence Act. If the prosecution did not submit certificate, you should raise an objection about its admissibility.

In Anvar P. V. vs P. K. Basheer 2014 and Mohammad Arif vs State of NCT Delhi 2023, the Supreme Court has held that electronic evidence shall not be admitted unless supported by certificate under section 65-B.

You must raise objection at this stage because if you fail then cannot raise such an objection at the later stage. In Dayamathi vs Shaffi 2004 the Supreme Court has held that objection should be raised at the time of admission of evidence but not at the later stage or in appeal.

If that recording was not taken from CCTV the prosecution cannot produce a certificate. In that certificate the prosecution is bound to state the particulars of the device, mode of copying that recording and to prove that the original recording is still stored in the orginal device.

If recording is taken from a mobile phone by concealing the date of recording the evidence itself will become inadmissible. If prosecution produced CCTV recording by concealing its original source, it will not be in position to produce a certificate. So, raising objection you can protect yourself from such false evidence.

Also read: Understanding electronic evidence

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Shivendra Pratap Singh

Advocate

Advocate Shivendra, practicing law since 2005, specializes in criminal and matrimonial cases, extensive litigatin experience before the High Court, Sessions court & Family Court. He established kanoonirai.com in 2014 to provide dependable and pragmatic legal support. Over the years, he has successfully assisted thousands of clients, making the platform a trusted resource for criminal and matrimonial dispute resolution in India.

Related Matters

क्या चेक बाउंस का केस मियाद समाप्त होने के बाद भी दाखिल हो सकता है

Negotiable Instruments Act के अंतर्गत, वैधानिक अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी चेक बाउंस का मामला दायर किया जा सकता है। यदि शिकायतकर्ता देरी का उचित कारण प्रस्तुत करता है, तो न्यायालय विलंब को क्षमा कर शिकायत स्वीकार कर सकता है। नोटिस के बाद निर्धारित समय में भुगतान न होने पर कार्यवाही प्रारंभ की जा सकती है।

Cancellation of bail when accused tempering with witness

Seeking the cancellation of bail is possible when an accused person tampers with witnesses or influences a trial. This guide explains legal grounds for such actions, focusing on mandatory procedures under Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and post-bail threats. Learn how victims can approach higher courts to ensure a fair trial and protect their rights.

Evidence of interested witness is admissible in criminal proceedings

In criminal law, the testimony of a related witness cannot be discarded solely due to their relationship with the victim. This legal overview clarifies the distinction between related and interested witnesses, citing key Supreme Court rulings. It explains how natural witnesses provide admissible evidence that reliably forms the basis for a conviction, even without independent corroboration.

SDM cannot attach property under section 146 crpc when civil suit is pending

A Sub-Divisional Magistrate cannot legally attach property under Section 146 of the CrPC if a civil suit regarding the same property is already pending. This guide explains why such orders lack jurisdiction and outlines the proper legal remedy, including filing a petition under Section 482 CrPC to the High Court based on established Supreme Court precedents.

Produce Pendrive as Evidence: Legal Process Explained

Legal experts clarify that digital evidence, such as a pen drive, can be produced even at an advanced stage of a criminal trial under Section 294 of the CrPC. If a trial court rejects such material evidence based on timing, the defendant may challenge the order in the High Court to ensure a fair trial and just adjudication.